Cited by 119Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

A randomized controlled trial of emotion regulation therapy for generalized anxiety disorder with and without co-occurring depression

Open access
Mennin, Douglas S., Fresco, David M., O'Toole, Mia Skytte, Heimberg, Richard G.·2018·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depression (MDD), especially when they co-occur, are associated with suboptimal treatment response. One common feature of these disorders is negative self-referential processing (NSRP; i.e., worry, rumination), which worsens treatment outcome. Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT) integrates principles from affect science with traditional and contemporary cognitive-behavioral treatments to identify and modify the functional nature of NSRP by targeting motivational and regulatory mechanisms, as well as behavioral consequences. METHOD: Building on encouraging open trial findings, 53 patients with a primary diagnosis of GAD (43% with comorbid MDD) were randomly assigned to immediate treatment with ERT (n = 28) or a modified attention control condition (MAC, n = 25). RESULTS: ERT patients, as compared with MAC patients, evidenced statistically and clinically meaningful improvement on clinical indicators of GAD and MDD, worry, rumination, comorbid disorder severity, functional impairment, quality of life, as well as hypothesized mechanisms reflecting mindful attentional, metacognitive, and overall emotion regulation, which all demonstrated mediation of primary outcomes. This superiority of ERT exceeded medium effect sizes with most outcomes surpassing conventions for a large effect. Treatment effects were maintained for nine months following the end of acute treatment. Overall, ERT resulted in high rates of high endstate functioning for both GAD and MDD that were maintained into the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide encouraging support for the efficacy and hypothesized mechanisms underlying ERT and point to fruitful directions for improving our understanding and treatment of complex clinical conditions such as GAD with co-occurring MDD. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000289

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 119

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Di Nardo PA Brown TA Barlow DH 1994 Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime Version (ADIS-IV-L) New York Oxford University Press
  2. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 2002 Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, non-patient edition with psychotic screen New York Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute
  3. Raab HA Sandman C Seeley S García-Lesy E Fresco DM Liston C Mennin DS 2017 Increased prefrontal activation to negative stimuli following Emotion Regulation Therapy in young adults with generalized anxiety disorder Manuscript under review

Authors
Mennin, D. S., Fresco, D. M., O'Toole, M. S., & Heimberg, R. G.
Affiliations
  • Kent State University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Mennin, Douglas S.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2018-03
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
268-281
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2792164547
Cited by
119
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1 R34 MH70682-01A2)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL119977)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (P30NR015326)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
emotion regulation therapy, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, comorbid depression, worry, rumination, emotion regulation, metacognition, mindful attention, maintenance of treatment effects, quality of life, functional disability
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Emotions, Humans, Motivation, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review