The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 30 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis examined 30 randomized controlled trials (32 study sites; 35 study arms) that tested the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for alcohol or other drug use disorders. The study aim was to provide estimates of efficacy against three levels of experimental contrast (i.e., minimal [k = 5]; nonspecific therapy [k = 11]; specific therapy [k = 19]) for consumption frequency and quantity outcomes at early (1 to 6 months [kes = 41]) and late (8+ months [kes = 26]) follow-up time points. When pooled effect sizes were statistically heterogeneous, study-level moderators were examined. METHOD: The inverse-variance weighted effect size was calculated for each study and pooled under random effects assumptions. Sensitivity analyses included tests of heterogeneity, study influence, and publication bias. RESULTS: CBT in contrast to minimal treatment showed a moderate and significant effect size that was consistent across outcome type and follow-up. When CBT was contrasted with a nonspecific therapy or treatment as usual, treatment effect was statistically significant for consumption frequency and quantity at early, but not late, follow-up. CBT effects in contrast to a specific therapy were consistently nonsignificant across outcomes and follow-up time points. Of 10 pooled effect sizes examined, two showed moderate heterogeneity, but multivariate analyses revealed few systematic predictors of between-study variance. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis shows that CBT is more effective than a no treatment, minimal treatment, or nonspecific control. Consistent with findings on other evidence-based therapies, CBT did not show superior efficacy in contrast to another specific modality. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CBT effects in contrast to a specific therapy were consistently non-significant across outcomes and follow-up time points.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Abstract > Results.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When CBT was contrasted with a non-specific therapy or treatment as usual, treatment effect was statistically significant for consumption frequency and quantity at early, but not late, follow-up.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Abstract > Results.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of ten pooled effect sizes examined, two showed moderate heterogeneity, but multivariate analyses revealed few systematic predictors of between-study variance.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Abstract > Results.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When CBT was contrasted with a non-specific therapy or treatment as usual, treatment effect was statistically significant for consumption frequency and quantity at early, but not late, follow-up.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Abstract > Results.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of ten pooled effect sizes examined, two showed moderate heterogeneity, but multivariate analyses revealed few systematic predictors of between-study variance.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Abstract > Results.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“and only one study provided late follow-up quantity data (Kivlahan et al., 1990)”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Results > CBT Effect by Contrast Type, Outcome Type, and Follow-up Time Point
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kivlahan et al., 1990
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted above, this type of contrast characterized the majority of studies reviewed”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This pattern of findings held for minimal and non-specific therapy contrasts”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although quantity outcomes (kes = 19) were reported less consistently than frequency outcomes (kes = 47)”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, reporting of therapist training (44%), supervision frequency and/or methods (70%), and fidelity (7%) was variable in the sample of studies.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion > Limitations
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 16
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The final meta-analytic sample was comprised of K = 30 studies, with 32 study sites (i.e., two studies provided two sites each, Project MATCH Research Group, 1997; McAuliffe, 1990), and a total of 5,398 participants.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Method > Literature Search
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This meta-analysis examined 30 randomized controlled trials (32 study sites; 35 study arms) that tested the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for alcohol or other drug use disorders (AUD/SUD).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Abstract > Objective.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CBT in contrast to minimal treatment showed a moderate and significant effect size that was consistent across outcome type and follow-up.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Abstract > Results.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“two out of 10 pooled effect sizes were determined to have sufficient systematic heterogeneity to warrant moderator analyses. Of these two estimates (I2 range = 45 – 59%), only one subgroup also contained a sufficient k number of studies to provide variability in the covariates examined.”
- Also stated in: § Limitations · plain
“In this study, two of 10 subgroup effect sizes showed greater than 40% systematics heterogeneity, and one of these two subgroups had a sufficient number of studies to allow multivariate moderator analysis.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Results > Analysis of Heterogeneous Pooled Effect Sizes
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Limitations · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consistent with a number of evidence-based addictions therapies, CBT effect sizes were small to non-significant in contrast to non-specific and specific therapies, respectively.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Conclusion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The pooled effect size for frequency outcomes at early follow-up was small and statistically significant (g = .18: 95% CI = .02, .35, p = .04; tau2 = .03, Q > .05, I2 = 45%; k = 9)6 with a success rate roughly 8% higher than the median within the contrast condition.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Results > CBT Effect by Contrast Type, Outcome Type, and Follow-up Time Point
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, the derived effect sizes showed minimal heterogeneity, and when heterogeneity was observed, moderator analyses revealed few significant moderating factors possibly due to low statistical power.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They reported a small overall effect size (r = .14, p < .05), and suggested relapse prevention was more effective for alcohol use disorder than for other substances and when delivered in combination with a pharmacological intervention.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Irvin and colleagues (1999)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The current meta-analysis shows that CBT is more effective than a no treatment, minimal treatment, or non-specific control.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Abstract > Conclusions.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In comparison, effects for non-specific contrasts (i.e., a passive, but time-matched or usual care control condition; e.g., treatment as usual, supportive therapy, drug counseling) and specific contrasts (i.e., another manualized therapy condition; e.g., Motivational Interviewing, Contingency Management) were small and more common in the literature (g =.15, p < .005, k = 32/53; g =.11, p < .05, k”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Magill & Ray, 2009
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These are established elements of community-based care and confer benefit in their own right (SAMHSA, 2017).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites SAMHSA, 2017
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In comparison, effects for non-specific contrasts (i.e., a passive, but time-matched or usual care control condition; e.g., treatment as usual, supportive therapy, drug counseling) and specific contrasts (i.e., another manualized therapy condition; e.g., Motivational Interviewing, Contingency Management) were small and more common in the literature (g =.15, p < .005, k = 32/53; g =.11, p < .05, k”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Magill & Ray, 2009
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The cognitive-behavioral emphasis on relapse prevention suggests this is a treatment well-suited to abstinence maintenance and long-term functioning.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Finally, to test for potential publication bias, the relationship between error and effect size was assessed using rank correlation (Begg & Mazumdar, 1994) and graphical methods (Egger, Smith, Schneider, & Minder, 1997).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Method > Data Analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Begg & Mazumdar, 1994
- Not checked yetcites Egger, Smith, Schneider, & Minder, 1997
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but caution is warranted due to the relatively smaller number of primary studies contributing quantity outcome effect estimates.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sensitivity analyses included tests of heterogeneity, study influence, and publication bias.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Abstract > Method.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Abstract screening occurred by two raters in ABSTRKR (Wallace, Small, Brodley, Lau, & Trikalinos, 2012).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Method > Literature Search
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“They reported a small overall effect size (r = .14, p < .05), and suggested relapse prevention was more effective for alcohol use disorder than for other substances and when delivered in combination with a pharmacological intervention.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Irvin and colleagues (1999)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In 2009, Magill and Ray followed up this work with a meta-analysis of 53 experimental CBT studies, reporting a similar overall effect size (g = .15, p < .005), although findings related to superior effects with alcohol use disorder were not replicated.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Magill & Ray, 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Trimmed estimates with influential studies removed (Baujat, Mahé, Pignon, & Hill, 2002) were also provided.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Method > Data Analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baujat, Mahé, Pignon, & Hill, 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this meta-analysis, we selected two types of treatment outcomes a priori. These were alcohol or other drug use frequency and quantity.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“study-level risk-of-bias (Higgins et al., 2011).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Method > Primary Study Characteristic Variables
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Higgins et al., 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further, qualitative reviews have concluded that CBT is more effective than no treatment, but have reported mixed results on key questions such as efficacy over another evidence-based therapy (Longabaugh & Morgenstern, 1999), effect variability by primary drug type (Mastroleo & Monti, 2013; McHugh, Hearon, & Otto, 2010), and the optimal timing of intervention effects (Carroll & Onken, 2005).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mastroleo & Monti, 2013
- Not checked yetcites McHugh, Hearon, & Otto, 2010
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Figure 1 provides a visual representation of study inclusion for the present report on stand-alone CBT efficacy with adult AUD/SUD; the figure follows QUORUM guidelines (Moher et al., 1999).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Method > Literature Search
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moher et al., 1999
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Further, optimal outcomes could vary as a function of intervention modality, including specific ingredients and purported mechanisms of action (Donovan et al., 2012).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion > Limitations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Donovan et al., 2012
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Further, qualitative reviews have concluded that CBT is more effective than no treatment, but have reported mixed results on key questions such as efficacy over another evidence-based therapy (Longabaugh & Morgenstern, 1999), effect variability by primary drug type (Mastroleo & Monti, 2013; McHugh, Hearon, & Otto, 2010), and the optimal timing of intervention effects (Carroll & Onken, 2005).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carroll & Onken, 2005
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conducted sensitivity analyses throughout data analysis and considered heterogeneity and moderator analyses as two primary methods for examining effect size validity.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Method > Data Analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The trade-off was that some effect estimates were comprised of a small number of primary studies, which could result in underpowered moderator analysis if heterogeneity was present in these pooled effects.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion > Limitations
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses of CBT in contrast to a non-specific therapy showed three influential studies that, when removed, the overall effect size became non-significant (gtrimmed ~ .07 to .26).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Results > CBT Effect by Contrast Type, Outcome Type, and Follow-up Time Point
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses of CBT in contrast to another specific therapy showed no influential studies and no evidence of publication bias (Figure 4; τ = .00, p = .500).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Results > CBT Effect by Contrast Type, Outcome Type, and Follow-up Time Point
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Specifically, the effect of CBT over no treatment was large (g =.79, p < .005), but this type of contrast was rare (k = 6/53).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Magill & Ray, 2009
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Further, qualitative reviews have concluded that CBT is more effective than no treatment, but have reported mixed results on key questions such as efficacy over another evidence-based therapy (Longabaugh & Morgenstern, 1999), effect variability by primary drug type (Mastroleo & Monti, 2013; McHugh, Hearon, & Otto, 2010), and the optimal timing of intervention effects (Carroll & Onken, 2005).”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Longabaugh & Morgenstern, 1999
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“They reported a small overall effect size (r = .14, p < .05), and suggested relapse prevention was more effective for alcohol use disorder than for other substances and when delivered in combination with a pharmacological intervention.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Irvin and colleagues (1999)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meta-analyses of alcohol or other drug treatments generally show effect sizes in the small to moderate range”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bertholet, Daeppen, Wietlisbach, Fleming, & Burnand, 2005
- Not checked yetcites Lundahl, Kunz, Brownell, Tollefson, & Burke, 2010
- Not checked yetcites Prendergast et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data were extracted in two independent passes conducted by trained raters (i.e., fourth and fifth authors), and showed a between-rater agreement rate of 95.3%.”
§ A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition > Method > Primary Study Characteristic Variables
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
No CBT meta-analysis across substances or for individual substances had been conducted since Magill and Ray (2009).
“To our knowledge, this was the last CBT meta-analysis across substances, or for individual substances, conducted to date.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Small sample and small effect studies characterize unpublished research.
“Here, small sample/small effect studies are assumed to characterize unpublished research, resulting in a significant and negative relationship, thus an asymmetrical funnel plot, when publication bias is present.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The population effect size has an assumed distribution with both systematic and random sources of variability.
“In this approach, there is an assumed distribution for the population effect size with both systematic and random sources of variability (Hedges & Vevea, 1998).”
The paper relies on this without support.
This is the first meta-analysis of CBT efficacy for adults with alcohol and other drug use disorders conducted in 10 years.
“To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis of CBT efficacy for adults with alcohol and other drug use disorders conducted in 10 years, despite ongoing research and utilization of the CBT approach.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Studies using a no treatment or minimal treatment contrast provide the optimal conditions for examining the durability of treatment effect.
“Studies using a no treatment or a minimal treatment contrast provide the optimal conditions for examining the durability of treatment effect.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is limited evidence for differential efficacy between specific therapies (the dodo bird effect).
“despite the known phenomenon of limited evidence for differential efficacy between specific therapies (i.e., the dodo bird effect).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Evidence-based strategies, including contingency management (CM), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), motivational interviewing (MI), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and family-based interventions, have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing substance use and enhancing treatment outcomes”
From Navigating the Complex Intersection of Substance Use and Psychiatric Disorders: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, when contrasted with any spe cific therapy, CBT's effects were consistently non- significant a- cross outcomes and follow- up time points 235 .”
From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [235]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Compared to minimal treatment (waitlist, brief psychoeducation), CBT demonstrated a moderate and significant effect size consistently across outcome types and follow-up periods.”
From A Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [120]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Contrast with non-specific therapy (supportive therapy, drug counseling) showed significant effects on consumption frequency and quantity at early follow-up, but not at late follow-up.”
From A Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [120]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, CBT effects compared to specific therapy (motivational interviewing, contingency management) were consistently non-significant across outcomes and follow-up times”
From A Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [120]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Early minimal-follow-up k differs within Results and Discussion
MinorOne part of the paper reports 4 early minimal-contrast frequency studies, while another says frequency outcomes at early follow-up for no/minimal contrast came from 5 studies. These are the same contrast and outcome/timepoint description, so the counts do not match.
“the pooled effect size for frequency outcomes was g = .58 (95% CI = .15, 1.01, p = .009; tau2 = .11, Q > .05, I2 = 59%; k = 4) at early follow-up”
“Studies using a no treatment or a minimal treatment contrast provide the optimal conditions for examining the durability of treatment effect. In these cases, studies reporting frequency outcomes demonstrated that CBT effects were quite durable with moderate effects at both early (k = 5) and late (k = 4) follow-ups.”
No treatment/minimal count stated as seven in Discussion but five in Abstract
MinorThe Discussion says estimates were sizable only among seven studies contrasting CBT with a minimal comparison, whereas the Abstract lists minimal contrast as k = 5. The paper does not explain this change in denominator or whether one refers to studies and the other to study sites.
“In the present study, estimates of effect were sizable only among the seven studies contrasting CBT with a minimal comparison.”
“The study aim was to provide estimates of efficacy against three levels of experimental contrast (i.e., minimal [k = 5]; non-specific therapy [k = 11]; specific therapy [k = 19]) for consumption frequency and quantity outcomes at early (1 – 6 months [kes = 41]) and late (8+ months [kes = 26]) follow-up time points.”
Minimal-comparison study counts change in the discussion
MinorThe results report four early and two late studies for frequency outcomes with a minimal-treatment comparison. The discussion reports five early and four late studies for the same outcomes and comparison.
“the pooled effect size for frequency outcomes was g = .58 (95% CI = .15, 1.01, p = .009; tau2 = .11, Q > .05, I2 = 59%; k = 4) at early follow-up and g = .44 (95% CI = .02, .86, p = .039; tau2 = .00, Q > .05, I2 = 0%; k = 2) at late follow-up.”
“In these cases, studies reporting frequency outcomes demonstrated that CBT effects were quite durable with moderate effects at both early (k = 5) and late (k = 4) follow-ups.”
Outcome-type and follow-up totals differ
MinorThe abstract reports 41 early and 26 late effect sizes, totaling 67. The discussion reports 19 quantity and 47 frequency effect sizes, totaling 66, although these are the two stated ways of dividing the effect sizes.
“early (1 – 6 months [kes = 41]) and late (8+ months [kes = 26]) follow-up time points.”
“quantity outcomes (kes = 19) were reported less consistently than frequency outcomes (kes = 47)”
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
SAUNDERS, J. B., AASLAND, O. G., BABOR, T. F., DE LA FUENTE, J. R., & GRANT, M. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x · Cited by 13,597
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses
Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1 · Cited by 3,445
The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses
Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003 · Cited by 3,215
An Improved Diagnostic Evaluation Instrument for Substance Abuse Patients
McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L. B., WOODY, G. E., & Brien, C. P. O. (1980) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198001000-00006 · Cited by 3,163
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 331
Features of Addiction in Binge-Eating Disorder: Considerations for Screening and Treatment
Paul, A. M., Ghanta, A., & Chao, A. M. (2023) · Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation · doi:10.2147/sar.s391636 · Cited by 10
Electronic interventions in primary care to address substance use: A systematic review
Villanueva‐Blasco, V. J., Eslava, D., Olave, L., & Torrens, M. (2024) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108073 · Cited by 7
Predescu, I.-A., Jîjie, A.-R., Pătrașcu, D., Pasc, A.-L.-V., Piroș, E. L., Trandafirescu, C. M., Oancea, C. I., Dehelean, C. A., & Moacă, E.-A. (2025) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy13010007 · Cited by 7
Marsden, J., Kelleher, M., Dunbar, F., Ermakova, A. O., Mitcheson, L., Roberts, C., Rucker, J., Scott, G., Saeger, I., Small, F., et al. (2025) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.70260 · Cited by 7
Articulation of cognitive-behavioral therapy and neuropsychology: A scoping review
Lopes, F. M., Fritzen, B. H., Antunes, G. T., Marcondes, M. V., de Mendonça, B. T. V., & Dias, N. M. (2023) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2023.2215890 · Cited by 9
Rubenis, A. J., Barnett, A., & Arunogiri, S. (2023) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.1080/16066359.2023.2227092 · Cited by 8
Votaw, V. R., & Witkiewitz, K. A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32483-3_20 · Cited by 7
Lehoux, T., Capobianco, A., Lacoste, J., Rollier, S., Mopsus, Y., Melgire, M., Lécuyer, F., Gervilla, M., & Weiner, L. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08275-7 · Cited by 7
Psychedelics and substance use disorder treatment
DuPont, C. M., & Johnson, M. W. (2025) · International review of neurobiology · doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2025.03.005 · Cited by 8
Hahn, C. K., Kilimnik, C. D., Brady, K. T., Marx, B. P., ROTHBAUM, B. O., Saladin, M. E., Gilmore, A. K., Metts, C. L., & Back, S. E. (2022) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.107002 · Cited by 7
Expectations about how alcohol consumption influences gambling
Horn, T. L., Lerma, M., Pfund, R. A., & Whelan, J. P. (2023) · International Gambling Studies · doi:10.1080/14459795.2023.2224858 · Cited by 7
Beck, A. K., Larance, B., Deane, F. P., Baker, A., Manning, V., Hides, L. M., Shakeshaft, A. P., Argent, A., & Kelly, P. J. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108814 · Cited by 8
Mhaidat, I., Al‐Yateem, N., Mamari, S. A., & Al-Suwaidi, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1444233 · Cited by 6
Buabang, E. K., Köster, M., Hogarth, L., & Moors, A. (2025) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-025-00651-w · Cited by 7
Plokhykh, V., Duka, M., Cassidy, L., Chen, C., Malakyan, K., Isaakidis, P., Donchuk, D., Truzyan, N., Reid, A. J. S., Siomak, O., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries · doi:10.3855/jidc.13827 · Cited by 6
Increasing Attendance in Addiction Treatment With Limited Resources: A Narrative Review
Rubenis, A. J., Nation, J. A., Katz, E. C., & Arunogiri, S. (2022) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000001033 · Cited by 6
Carpenter, K. M., Choi, C. J., Basaraba, C. N., Pavlicová, M., Brooks, D. J., Brezing, C., Bisaga, A. M., Nunes, E. V., Mariani, J. J., & LEVIN, F. R. (2023) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000676 · Cited by 6
Accomodating User Expressivity while Maintaining Safety for a Virtual Alcohol Misuse Counselor
Ólafsson, S., Pedrelli, P., Wallace, B., & Bickmore, T. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3570945.3607361 · Cited by 6
Düring, S. W., Sivertsen, D. M., & Johansen, K. S. (2025) · Journal of Dual Diagnosis · doi:10.1080/15504263.2025.2478900 · Cited by 6
Coping Flexibility and Alcohol-Related Outcomes: Examining Coping Motives as Mediators
Jenzer, T., Cheesman, A., Shaw, R. J., Egerton, G. A., & Read, J. P. (2022) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2022.2125274 · Cited by 7
Simpson, T. L., Sistad, R. E., Brooks, J. T., Newberger, N. G., & Livingston, N. A. (2022) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports · doi:10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100116 · Cited by 6
MacLean, R. R., Ankawi, B., Driscoll, M., Gordon, M. A., Frankforter, T. L., Nich, C., Szollosy, S. K., Loya, J. M., Brito, L., Ribeiro, M. I. P., et al. (2024) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/54342 · Cited by 6
Selected cognitive-behavioural models of behavioural addictions
Kleszczewska-Albińska, A. (2022) · Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna · doi:10.15557/pipk.2022.0002 · Cited by 7
Drug and alcohol psychosocial interventions
Fisher, A. C., Nepal, S., Harvey, L. R., Peach, N., Marel, C., KAY‐LAMBKIN, F. J., Teesson, M., Newton, N. C., & Mills, K. L. (2020) · doi:10.57022/sczj5829 · Cited by 6
Leonard, A., Tairi, T., & Blampied, N. (2022) · Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning · doi:10.1080/14729679.2022.2153370 · Cited by 5
Contreras-Pérez, M. E., Morris, S. L., Hospital, M. M., & Wagner, E. F. (2023) · Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work · doi:10.1080/26408066.2023.2168507 · Cited by 5
Pachankis, J. E., Chiaramonte, D. M., Scheer, J. R., Ankrum, H., Eisenstadt, B. E., Hobbs, R. J., Baldwin, H., Kidd, J. D., Witkiewitz, K. A., Esserman, D. A., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086738 · Cited by 5
Hesse, M., del Palacio‐González, A., & Thylstrup, B. (2022) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04025-8 · Cited by 5
Peter, S. C., Halverson, T. F., Blakey, S. M., Pugh, M. J., Beckham, J. C., Calhoun, P. S., & Kimbrel, N. A. (2022) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/ser0000683 · Cited by 6
Nègre, F., Lemercier-Dugarin, M., Gomet, R., Pélissolo, A., Malbos, É., Romo, L., & Zerdazi, E. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08271-x · Cited by 6
Group based metacognitive therapy for alcohol use disorder: a pilot study
Kroener, J., Eickholt, M. L., & Sosic-Vasic, Z. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1375960 · Cited by 5
Eadie, J., Gutiérrez, G., Moghimi, E., Stephenson, C., Khalafi, P., Nikjoo, N., Jagayat, J., Gizzarelli, T., Reshetukha, T., Omrani, M., et al. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/44694 · Cited by 5
Tratamiento basado en atención plena compasiva: un estudio piloto en policonsumidores de drogas
Gutiérrez, J. L. B., Cruz, D. M., & Moreno-Coutiño, A. B. (2020) · Psicología y Salud · doi:10.25009/pys.v31i1.2673 · Cited by 5
Grilo, C. M. (2020) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19121256 · Cited by 5
Phillips, A. Z., Wang, Y., & Allen, N. B. (2023) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2023.209251 · Cited by 4
Lang, C., Weisel, K. K., Saur, S., Fuhrmann, L. M., Schoenleber, A., Reichl, D., Enewoldsen, N., Steins‐Loeber, S., & Berking, M. (2024) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-024-00457-7 · Cited by 4
Benitez, B., Loya, J. M., Jaramillo, Y., Muro-Rodriguez, N. J., Perez, O. F. R., Nich, C., Frankforter, T. L., Paris, M., & Kiluk, B. D. (2024) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2024.209536 · Cited by 4
Self-citationGaddum, O., Gutwinski, S., Lütt, A., Moon, D. U., Beck, A., Ruckser, N., Turno, A., Schöneck, R., Bermpohl, F., & Tsamitros, N. (2025) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-025-00587-6 · Cited by 4
Martins, S. R., Corrêa, P. C. R. P., da Costa, C. B. F., de Sousa, M. G., Tourinho, C. A. P., & Borges, V. L. G. (2025) · Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia · doi:10.36416/1806-3756/e20250061 · Cited by 4
Behavioral Therapy as an Adjunct to Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder
McHugh, R. K., Bailey, A. J., McConaghy, B. A., Weiss, R. D., Fiellin, D. A., Hillhouse, M. P., Moore, B. A., & Fitzmaurice, G. M. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28529 · Cited by 4
Contingency management for unhealthy alcohol use: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Alessi, M. R., Barbetta, L. M. D. S., Andreata, V. G., Leal, A. C. T., Freitas, R. P. D., Costa, G. P. A., Nero, N., & Anand, A. (2025) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.70198 · Cited by 4
Murphy, J. G., Dennhardt, A. A., & Gex, K. S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108976213.015 · Cited by 5
Current treatments of alcohol use disorder
Dionisi, T., Sario, G. D., Mori, L. D., Spagnolo, G., Antonelli, M., Tarli, C., Sestito, L., Mancarella, F. A., Ferrarese, D., Mirijello, A., et al. (2024) · International review of neurobiology · doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2024.02.005 · Cited by 4
Caballería, E., Balcells‐Oliveró, M., Bataller, R. A., Bruguera, P., Cabrera, N., Estruch, A., Freixa, N., García-Pañella, O., Graell, M., Gratacós‐Ginès, J., et al. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241242787 · Cited by 4
Li, Y., Niemelä, S., & Denissoff, A. (2025) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-025-00642-x · Cited by 4
Contrasting the Effects of Alcohol and Alcohol Expectancies on Gambling Behavior
Lipinski, D., Horn, T. L., Whelan, J., & Pfund, R. A. (2023) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-023-10222-1 · Cited by 4
Maahs, S., Leclair, D., Gomez‐Mancilla, B., Kiluk, B. D., Muthusamy, V. S., Banerjee, P. S., Dasgupta, S., & Waye, K. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1230699 · Cited by 4
Self-citationHazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders
(2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00414-1 · Cited by 4
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Thomas, G., Chatim, A., Ganju, N., Abdo, M. G., Kankaria, A. A., Shankar, N., Thomas, J., Elnasseh, A., Aabye, J., Lewis, K., et al. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-98814-8.00022-6 · Cited by 4
Addiction and relational therapy: an efficacious approach
Bufford, L. G., & Lappan, S. N. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04843-3 · Cited by 4
McHugh, R. K., Bailey, A. J., Weiss, R. D., & Fitzmaurice, G. M. (2024) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports · doi:10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100226 · Cited by 4
Saur, S. J., Weisel, K. K., Lang, C., Fuhrmann, L. M., Meurer, N., Reichl, D., Zink, M., Heepe, P., Hillemacher, T., Braunwarth, W., et al. (2025) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000545817 · Cited by 3
Mhaidat, I., Taherian, M. R., Nazari, S. S. H., Mosavi-Jarrahi, A., Yeganeh, H., Al‐Yateem, N., Al-Marzouqi, A., Rahman, S. A., & Vally, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-025-01573-4 · Cited by 4
Morris, J., & Choi, N. G. (2026) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2026.2654711 · Cited by 3
Schmid, P., Nauss, C., Jauch-Ederer, C., Prinz, P., Tschöke, S., & Uhlmann, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1432679 · Cited by 4
Bağımlılıkta psikoterapi kuramları
Yıldız, M., & Tamam, L. (2025) · Journal of Dependence · doi:10.51982/bagimli.1574084 · Cited by 3
Trait-based recovery enhances engagement and reduces anxiety and depression symptoms
Roop, P. D. J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-06384-0 · Cited by 3
Kunorubwe, T. (2025) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x25100263 · Cited by 4
A retrospective examination of changes in drinking motives during the early COVID-19 pandemic
Spillane, N. S., Schick, M. R., Nalven, T., Crawford, M. C., & Martz, A. S. (2022) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.1177/00912174221110086 · Cited by 3
Lai, Y., Lee, K., & Huang, T.-W. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04529-w · Cited by 3
Structural Pathways Between PTSD Symptoms and Alcohol Use Consequences Among Women
Mahoney, C. T., Dixon, K. E., Daugherty, Y. T., Bindbeutel, K. M., Horne, S. D., Littleton, H., Dworkin, E. R., Livingston, N. A., & Galano, M. M. (2023) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-023-01068-0 · Cited by 3
Barbosa, C., Dowd, W. N., Karriker‐Jaffe, K. J., & Zarkin, G. A. (2023) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.15186 · Cited by 3
Palfai, T. P., Bernier, L., Kratzer, M. P. L., Magane, K. M., Fielman, S., Otis, J. D., Heeren, T., Winter, M. R., & Stein, M. D. (2024) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-024-00493-3 · Cited by 3
Review of Evidence-Based Strategies to Treat Alcohol Use Disorder
Worley, J. (2021) · Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · doi:10.3928/02793695-20211110-01 · Cited by 3
Cognitive and Behavioral Therapies
Thase, M. E., Khazanov, G. K., & Wright, J. H. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42825-9_35-1 · Cited by 3
de Beurs, E., Rademacher, C., Blankers, M., Peen, J., Dekker, J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2023) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.15184 · Cited by 3
Managing Pain in Patients With Comorbid Alcohol Use Disorder and Chronic Pain
Maleki, N., Thompson, B., Janiuk, K., Dhingra, L. K., & Chen, L. L. (2024) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-024-00563-1 · Cited by 3
Stage-Based Treatment Approaches for Substance Use Disorders
Mancini, M. A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59659-0_11 · Cited by 3
Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain and opioid use disorder
Gazzola, M. G., Beitel, M., Cutter, C. J., & Barry, D. T. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820237-1.00022-3 · Cited by 3
Upton, D., & Thirlaway, K. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003471233 · Cited by 4
Carpenter, K. M., Foltin, R. W., Haney, M., & Evans, S. M. (2023) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-023-00554-0 · Cited by 2
Ribeiro, N. S., de Oliveira, I. P., Almeida, L. M. R., SILVA, P. A., & Sartes, L. M. A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82614-6_29 · Cited by 2
Borgatti, D. A., Rowlett, J. K., & Berro, L. F. (2025) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jpet.2025.103693 · Cited by 2
Kim, J., Kwak, J., Jeong, H., Kim, N. J., Lee, S., Kim, Y., Kim, J., Han, S., Chun, H.-R., Park, K. J., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1695702 · Cited by 2
Nieto, S. J., Du, H., Meredith, L. R., Donato, S., Baskerville, W., McManus, K. R., Magill, M., & Ray, L. A. (2026) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.70373 · Cited by 2
Self-citationPadilla, F. M., Dinu, A. I., & Castro, C. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09073-x · Cited by 2
Luo, H.-S., Xiong, Y., Ding, X., Yang, H., Wu, J., Fu, Z., & Xiao, N. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121893 · Cited by 2
The Role of Self-Regulation Strategies in Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
Roos, C. R., Bowen, S. W., & Hedy Kober, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108976213.007 · Cited by 2
Pfund, R. A., Richards, D. K., Boness, C. L., Schwebel, F. J., Tonigan, J. S., Maisto, S. A., & Witkiewitz, K. A. (2022) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.22-00042 · Cited by 2
Self-citationKearns, N. T., Trachik, B. J., Fawver, B. J., Osgood, J. M., & Dretsch, M. N. (2023) · Alcohol · doi:10.1016/j.alcohol.2023.09.001 · Cited by 2
Leeman, R. F., Berey, B. L., Frohe, T. M., Ferreiro, A. V., & O’Malley, S. S. (2024) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.22-00362 · Cited by 2
Neuromarkers in addiction: definitions, development strategies, and recent advances
Harp, N. R., Wager, T. D., & Hedy Kober, A. (2024) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-024-02766-2 · Cited by 3
Generational and Gender Patterns of Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Black Adults
Miller-Roenigk, B. D., Wheeler, P. B., Jester, J. K., Hargons, C. N., & Stevens-Watkins, D. J. (2024) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2024.209436 · Cited by 2
Ndungu, R. W., Hammett, J. F., Peddle, A. K., Jaffe, A. E., Duckworth, J. C., & Stappenbeck, C. A. (2025) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-025-03138-x · Cited by 3
Kerekes, N., Bador, K., Smedeby, C., Hansen, L., Lundström, S., & Eriksson, M. (2025) · Addiction Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13722-025-00578-7 · Cited by 2
Alorfi, N. M. (2025) · International Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.2147/ijgm.s530721 · Cited by 2
Failures in cognitive behavior therapy: The state of the art
Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102122 · Cited by 2
Knox, A., Vargo, L. A., & Buckner, J. D. (2025) · American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1111/ajad.70092 · Cited by 2
Bringing Primary Care to Opioid Treatment Programs
Olsen, Y. K., & Mason, A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80818-1_12 · Cited by 2
Zhang, P., Zhan, J., Wang, S., Tang, Y., Chen, H., Wang, Y., Wei, X., Wen, H., Pan, T. S., Chen, Z., et al. (2022) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s372300 · Cited by 2
Awan, H., & Vergis, N. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.37443 · Cited by 2
Herbst, E. D., Pennington, D., Borsari, B. E., Manuel, J. K., Yalch, M. M., Alcid, E., Rivas, M. M., Delacruz, J., Rossi, N., Garcia, B., et al. (2023) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107250 · Cited by 2
Psychosocial Treatment Methods
Peirce, J. M., Antoine, D. G., Hammond, A. S., & KIDORF, M. S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618431.013.25 · Cited by 2
Alcohol and Drug Use Disorders
Baca-Atlas, M., Baca-Atlas, S. N., & Fedoriw, K. B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29171-5_6 · Cited by 1
Kim, H.-E., & Shim, E. (2024) · Korean Journal of Stress Research · doi:10.17547/kjsr.2024.32.3.161 · Cited by 1
Madde Kullanım Bozukluklarının Aileler Üzerindeki Etkisi: Sosyal Hizmet Perspektifinden Bir İnceleme
Kara, Y. (2024) · 19 Mayıs Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.52835/19maysbd.1600940 · Cited by 1
Le, S. M., Michel, L., Giang, L. M., Le, H. T., Nguyen, V., & Trouiller, P. (2025) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-025-01495-1 · Cited by 1
Aslan, R., Yazıcı, H. G., & Gökçen, O. (2025) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1080/01612840.2025.2538714 · Cited by 1
Amin, H., Khan, M. A., & Bukhari, M. A. S. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0343413 · Cited by 1
Kwon, M., Song, J. Y., Hwang, J. Y., Seong, S. J., Park, K. J., Jo, Y. T., Kim, Y. J., Ahn, M. E., & Lee, S.-K. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1717544 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Magill, M., Ray, L., Kiluk, B., Hoadley, A., Bernstein, M., Tonigan, J. S., & Carroll, K.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1093-1105
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- PMC
- PMC6856400
- OpenAlex
- W2980109357
- Semantic Scholar
- aede69e634a288213fe3b8142a863f778b2960f2
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA026006)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, alcoholism, substance use disorders, treatment efficacy, drinking frequency, alcohol consumption quantity, evidence-based treatment
- MeSH terms
- Alcoholism, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
