Cited by 120Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Impostor phenomenon and mental health: The influence of racial discrimination and gender.

Open access
Bernard, Donte L., Lige, Quiera M., Willis, Henry A., Sosoo, Effua E., Neblett, Enrique W.·2017·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

The impostor phenomenon (IP), or feelings of intellectual incompetence, reflects a maladaptive set of cognitions, which pose a significant psychological risk for African American emerging adults. In light of recent evidence suggesting that personal and sociocultural factors may influence the association between IP and psychological adjustment, this study used 2 waves of data to examine the extent to which gender and racial discrimination moderated the association between IP and indices of mental health among 157 African American college students (69% women; mean age = 18.30) attending a predominantly White institution. Analyses revealed that young African American women reporting higher frequencies of racial discrimination and women reporting lower levels of distress resulting from racial discrimination were most vulnerable to negative mental health outcomes, particularly at higher levels of IP. These findings suggest that IP may interact with gender and racial discrimination experiences to influence mental health outcomes. We discuss how these findings can be utilized to inform treatment of African American emerging adults experiencing IP and the importance of considering how gender and discrimination may intersect to exacerbate feelings of intellectual incompetence. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cou0000197

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernard, D. L., Lige, Q. M., Willis, H. A., Sosoo, E. E., & Neblett, E. W.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2017-03
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
155-166
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2586309240
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
impostor syndrome, racial discrimination, gender differences, African American college students, emerging adults, mental health, psychological distress, intersectionality, predominantly white institutions
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Social Perception, Stress, Psychological, Students, Southeastern United States, Young Adult, Self Report, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review