Pathways between self-esteem and depression in couples.
Abstract
Guided by concepts from a relational developmental perspective, this study examined intra- and interpersonal associations between self-esteem and depressive symptoms in a sample of 1,407 couples surveyed annually across 6 years in the Panel Analysis of Intimate Relations and Family Dynamics (pairfam) study. Autoregressive cross-lagged model results demonstrated that self-esteem predicted future depressive symptoms for male partners at all times, replicating the vulnerability model for men (low self-esteem is a risk factor for future depression). Additionally, a cross-partner association emerged between symptoms of depression: Higher depressive symptoms in one partner were associated with higher levels of depression in the other partner one year later. Finally, supportive dyadic coping, the support that partners reported providing to one another in times of stress, was tested as a potential interpersonal mediator of pathways between self-esteem and depression. Female partners' higher initial levels of self-esteem predicted male partners' subsequent reports of increased supportive dyadic coping, which, in turn, predicted higher self-esteem and fewer symptoms of depression among female partners in the future. Male partners' initially higher symptoms of depression predicted less frequent supportive dyadic coping subsequently reported by female partners, which was associated with increased feelings of depression in the future. Couple relations represent an important contextual factor that may be implicated in the developmental pathways connecting self-esteem and symptoms of depression. (PsycINFO Database Record
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The reduced self-esteem measure was a good proxy for the full Rosenberg self-esteem scale.
“Item reduction was based on factor and reliability analyses (see Scales Manual; Thönnissen et al. 2019) and the final measure was found to be a good proxy for the full scale (M. D. Johnson et al. 2017).”
From Patterns of Romantic Relationship Experiences and Psychosocial Adjustment From Adolescence to Young Adulthood (2021) · cites this paper as M. D. Johnson et al. 2017
Cites
Gender differences in depression: Critical review
Piccinelli, M., & Wilkinson, G. (2000) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.177.6.486 · Cited by 2,376 · cited 1× · see citing works
“During adolescence, women experience more rapid increases in symptoms of depression than do men (e.g., Hankin et al., 1998), and women maintain higher levels of depression throughout the remainder of adulthood compared to men (Piccinelli & Wilkinson, 2000).”
Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L. Y., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., McGee, R., & Angell, K. E. (1998) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.107.1.128 · Cited by 2,333 · see citing works
Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
Sowislo, J. F., & Orth, U. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028931 · Cited by 2,123 · see citing works
Self-esteem and the quest for felt security: How perceived regard regulates attachment processes.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.478 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Emotional Transmission in the Daily Lives of Families: A New Paradigm for Studying Family Process
Larson, R. W., & Almeida, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353879 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Whisman, M. A., & Uebelacker, L. A. (2009) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0014759 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, G., Li, Y., Lam, A. I. F., Tang, W., Seedat, S., Barbui, C., Papola, D., Panter-Brick, C., Waerden, J. V. D., Bryant, R., et al. (2023) · BMJ Mental Health · doi:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300802 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Mund, M., Johnson, M. D., & Nestler, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666928 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationGonzalez Avilés, T., Finn, C., & Neyer, F. J. (2021) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-020-01350-7 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Johnson, M. D., Galambos, N. L., Finn, C., Neyer, F. J., & Horne, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 787-799
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2586266340
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2014-00682)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- self-esteem, depression, couples, dyadic coping, vulnerability model, gender differences, depressive symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Family Characteristics, Female, Germany, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Sexual Partners, Social Support, Likelihood Functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review