Cited by 51Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Traits and Psychology

Pathways between self-esteem and depression in couples.

Johnson, Matthew D., Galambos, Nancy L., Finn, Christine, Neyer, Franz J., Horne, Rebecca M.·2017·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Guided by concepts from a relational developmental perspective, this study examined intra- and interpersonal associations between self-esteem and depressive symptoms in a sample of 1,407 couples surveyed annually across 6 years in the Panel Analysis of Intimate Relations and Family Dynamics (pairfam) study. Autoregressive cross-lagged model results demonstrated that self-esteem predicted future depressive symptoms for male partners at all times, replicating the vulnerability model for men (low self-esteem is a risk factor for future depression). Additionally, a cross-partner association emerged between symptoms of depression: Higher depressive symptoms in one partner were associated with higher levels of depression in the other partner one year later. Finally, supportive dyadic coping, the support that partners reported providing to one another in times of stress, was tested as a potential interpersonal mediator of pathways between self-esteem and depression. Female partners' higher initial levels of self-esteem predicted male partners' subsequent reports of increased supportive dyadic coping, which, in turn, predicted higher self-esteem and fewer symptoms of depression among female partners in the future. Male partners' initially higher symptoms of depression predicted less frequent supportive dyadic coping subsequently reported by female partners, which was associated with increased feelings of depression in the future. Couple relations represent an important contextual factor that may be implicated in the developmental pathways connecting self-esteem and symptoms of depression. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/dev0000276

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, M. D., Galambos, N. L., Finn, C., Neyer, F. J., & Horne, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2017-04
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
787-799
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2586266340
Cited by
51
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2014-00682)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
self-esteem, depression, couples, dyadic coping, vulnerability model, gender differences, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Family Characteristics, Female, Germany, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Sexual Partners, Social Support, Likelihood Functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review