The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity.
Abstract
Current prominent models of identity face challenges in bridging across divergent perspectives and apparent dichotomies such as personal or social-collective, conscious or unconscious, and epigenetic or discursive-relational, and affording pursuit of research questions that allows integrative answers. This article presents a coherent theoretical perspective on the integrative nature of identity and its developmental mechanisms. Adopting the contextual social role as a primary unit of analysis, the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity (DSMRI) conceptualizes role identity as a Complex Dynamic System (CDS) anchored in action that comprises the actor's ontological and epistemological beliefs, purpose and goals, self-perceptions and self-definitions, and perceived action possibilities in the role. These system components are conceptualized as interdependent, and identity development is viewed as emergent, continuous, nonlinear, contextualized, and given to influences from within and without the system. The role identity itself constitutes an element within a multilevel hierarchy, which at the unit of analysis of the individual reflects a CDS of the multiple roles that constitute the person's psychosocial identity. Identity development involves the formation and restructuring of relations within and among role identities through intra- and interpersonal processes that are mediated by sociocognitive and cultural means, and framed by the context as well as by implicit dispositions. The DSMRI provides a framework to conceptualize and investigate the nature of the identity system, its development, and the relationship between identity development and psychological functioning at different units of-analysis, across different developmental stages and contexts, and using quantitative and qualitative methodologies. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 1×
“Purpose and goals can differ on many dimensions, including intrinsic–extrinsic, individual–social, proximal–distal, specific– global, and self-oriented–other-oriented, with consequences to affect and motivation (Locke & Latham, 2002; Vansteenkiste, Lens, & Deci, 2006).”
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806 · cited 1×
“In addition to role identities that an actor presently occupies, the identity system includes also role identities for past roles that are no longer occupied, and role identities for future-imagined roles (Markus & Nurius, 1986).”
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312909 · Cited by 3,735
ECCLES, J. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520902832368 · Cited by 1,444
Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action.
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188 · Cited by 852 · cited 1×
“In trying to address a gap between stated future academic possible selves and actual academic pursuits among low-income and minority teens, Oyserman et al. (2006) intervened with middle-school students to link positive future-imagined academic possible selves (e.g., passing 8th grade) and feared…”
Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: a review and synthesis
Bosma, H. A., & Kunnen, E. S. (2001) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1006/drev.2000.0514 · Cited by 516 · cited 5×
“Based on this conceptualization, Kunnen and Bosma’s (Kunnen, 2012) model included the elements of “exploration in breadth,” “exploration in depth,” “strength of commitment,” the “outcome” of the “event,” “importance of the domain” to the person, and the personal attribute of “openness to experience.””
Influential
Cited by
Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective
Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318779957 · Cited by 390
Garner, J. K., & Kaplan, A. (2019) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1533811 · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, A., & Garner, J. K.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2036-2051
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2766447190
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 40.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/dev0000339
- The paper
- Kaplan, A., & Garner, J. K. (2017). A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.