Cited by 150Identity, Memory, and TherapySocial Representations and IdentityPersonality Traits and Psychology

A theoretical framework for the associations between identity and psychopathology.

Klimstra, Theo A., Denissen, Jaap J. A.·2017·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Identity research largely emerged from clinical observations. Decades of empirical work advanced the field in refining existing approaches and adding new approaches. Furthermore, the existence of linkages of identity with psychopathology is now well established. Unfortunately, both the directionality of effects between identity aspects and psychopathology symptoms, and the mechanisms underlying associations are unclear. In the present paper, we present a new framework to inspire hypothesis-driven empirical research to overcome this limitation. The framework has a basic resemblance to theoretical models for the study of personality and psychopathology, so we provide examples of how these might apply to the study of identity. Next, we explain that unique features of identity may come into play in individuals suffering from psychopathology that are mostly related to the content of one's identity. These include pros and cons of identifying with one's diagnostic label. Finally, inspired by Hermans' dialogical self theory and principles derived from Piaget's, Swann's and Kelly's work, we delineate a framework with identity at the core of an individual multidimensional space. In this space, psychopathology symptoms have a known distance (representing relevance) to one's identity, and individual multidimensional spaces are connected to those of other individuals in one's social network. We discuss methodological (quantitative and qualitative, idiographic and nomothetic) and statistic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/dev0000356

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klimstra, T. A., & Denissen, J. J. A.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2017-11
Volume
53
Issue
11
Pages
2052-2065
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2766057769
Cited by
150
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
19.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (452–14-013)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
identity, psychopathology, dialogical self theory, social networks, theoretical framework, personality and psychopathology
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Identification, Psychological, Models, Psychological, Research Design, Self Concept, Social Identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review