Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progress in understanding the emergence of human emotion.

Pollak, Seth D., Camras, Linda A., Cole, Pamela M.·2019·Developmental Psychology
DOI 10.1037/dev0000789PMC PMC7147951
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the past several decades, research on emotional development has flourished. Scientists have made progress in understanding infants', children's, and adults' abilities to recognize, communicate, and regulate their emotions. However, many questions remain unanswered or only partly answered. We are poised to move from descriptions of aspects of emotional functioning to conceptualizing and studying the developmental mechanisms that underlie those aspects. The gaps in our knowledge provide numerous opportunities for further investigation. With this special issue of Developmental Psychology, we aim to stimulate such progress, especially among colleagues at the beginning of their careers. The articles in this issue are intended to challenge our concepts and take research on emotional development in new directions. Toward this end, this special issue includes empirical studies, theoretical articles, novel conceptualizations, methodological innovations, and invited commentaries from scholars across a range of disciplines. In this introductory essay, we briefly review the history of research on emotional development and provide an overview of the contributions of this special issue with thoughts about the current state of the developmental science and areas in which further advancement on emotional development must be made. These include understanding the nature of emotion itself, identifying the mechanisms that produce developmental changes, examining emotion regulation within differing social contexts, and creating measures of culture that acknowledge globalization, historical change, and within-culture differences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/dev0000789

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Ekman P (1972). Universals and facial differences in facial expressions of emotion In Cole J (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 207– 282). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  2. Hess U (2017). Emotion categorization In Cohen H & Lefebvre C (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 107– 126). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier 10.1016/B978-0-08-101107-2.00005-1 · DOI
  3. Hollenstein T (2015). This time, it’s real: Affective flexibility, time scales, feedback loops, and the regulation of emotion. Emotion Review, 7, 308– 315. 10.1177/1754073915590621 · DOI
  4. Izard C (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum Press 10.1007/978-1-4899-2209-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lewis M, & Brooks J (1974). Self, others, and fear. Infants’ reactions to people In Lewis M & Rosenblum L (Eds.), The origins of fear: The origins of behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 195– 227). New York, NY: Wiley.
  6. McClelland MM, Tominey SL, Schmitt SA, & Duncan R (2017). SEL interventions in early childhood. The Future of Children, 27, 33– 47. 10.1353/foc.2017.0002 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ramsook KA, Cole PM, & Fields-Olivieri MA (2018). What emotion dysregulation looks like: Inferences from behavioral observations In Beauchaine TP & Crowell SE (Eds.), Oxford handbook of emotion dysregulation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Retrieved from https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190689285.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190689285-e-5 · DOI
  8. Sroufe LA (1996). Emotional development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511527661 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Tomkins S (1962). Affect imagery consciousness: Volume I: The positive affects. New York, NY: Springer.
  10. Tracy J, & Randles D (2011). Four models of basic emotions: A review of Ekman and Cordaro, Izard, Levenson, and Panksepp and Watt. Emotion Review, 3, 397– 405. 10.1177/1754073911410747 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Vygotsky LS (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 10.1037/11193-000 · DOI
  12. Wierzbicka A (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511521256 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Pollak, S. D., Camras, L. A., & Cole, P. M.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2019-09
Volume
55
Issue
9
Pages
1801-1811
ISSN
  • 1939-0599
  • 0012-1649
DOI
10.1037/dev0000789
PMC
PMC7147951
Cited by
35
References
84
Language
en
Licence
www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/open-access.aspx (vor)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH61285)
  • Sponsor name not included
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD076994)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.