Cited by 103Psychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceEmotion and Mood RecognitionArtificial Intelligence Applications

An Overview of Emotion in Artificial Intelligence

Assunção, Gustavo, Patrão, Bruno, Castelo-Branco, Miguel, Menezes, Paulo·2022·IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The field of artificial intelligence (AI) has gained immense traction over the past decade, producing increasingly successful applications as research strives to understand and exploit neural processing specifics. Nonetheless emotion, despite its demonstrated significance to reinforcement, social integration, and general development, remains a largely stigmatized and consequently disregarded topic by most engineers and computer scientists. In this article, we endorse emotion’s value for the advancement of artificial cognitive processing, as well as explore real-world use cases of emotion-augmented AI. A schematization is provided on the psychological-neurophysiologic basics of emotion in order to bridge the interdisciplinary gap preventing emulation and integration in AI methodology, as well as exploitation by current systems. In addition, we overview three major subdomains of AI greatly benefiting from emotion, and produce a systematic survey of meaningful yet recent contributions to each area. To conclude, we address crucial challenges and promising research paths for the future of emotion in AI with the hope that more researchers will develop an interest for the topic and find it easier to develop their own contributions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tai.2022.3159614

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current tools are constrained by basic, static, and discrete emotional representations, failing to meet participants' expectations for continuous and dynamic emotional simulation.

    “Current tools are constrained by basic, static, and discrete emotional representations [6, 36], failing to meet participants' expectations for continuous and dynamic emotional simulation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Assunção, G., Patrão, B., Castelo-Branco, M., & Menezes, P.
Affiliations
University of Coimbra (PT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2022-12
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
867-886
ISSN
2691-4581 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225463334
Cited by
103
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FCT (2020.05620.BD)
  • OE - National funds of FCT/MCTES (UIDB/00048/2020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
emotion recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review