Cited by 82Disability Education and EmploymentHigher Education Research StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Transition to higher education for students with autism: A systematic literature review.

Nuske, Alison, Rillotta, Fiona, Bellon, Michelle, Richdale, Amanda·2019·Journal of Diversity in Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/dhe0000108

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuske, A., Rillotta, F., Bellon, M., & Richdale, A.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
Published
2019-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
280-295
ISSN
  • 1938-8926 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-8934
OpenAlex
W2915717751
Cited by
82
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, transition to higher education, students with autism, higher education access, student support services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review