The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This report presents national estimates of fertility, family planning, and reproductive health indicators among females 15-44 years of age in the United States in 2002 from Cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). For selected indicators, data are also compared with earlier cycles of the NSFG. METHODS: Descriptive tables of numbers and percentages are presented and interpreted. Data were collected through in-person interviews of the household population 15-44 years of age in the United States between March 2002 and March 2003. The sample included 7,643 females and 4,928 males, and this report focuses on data from the female sample. The overall response rate for the Cycle 6 NSFG was 79 percent, and the response rate for women was 80 percent. RESULTS: Given the range of topics covered in the report, only selected findings are listed here. About 14 percent of recent births to women 15-44 years of age in 2002 were unwanted at time of conception, an increase from the 9 percent seen for recent births in 1995. Among recent births, 64 percent occurred within marriage, 14 percent within cohabiting unions, and 21 percent to women who were neither married nor cohabiting. The overall rate of breastfeeding initiation among recent births increased from 55 to 67 percent between 1995 and 2002. About 50 percent of women 15-44 had ever cohabited compared with 41 percent of women in the 1995 survey; the percentage of women currently cohabiting also increased, from 7 to 9 percent between 1995 and 2002.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement
Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., Bourguignon, J.-P., Giudice, L. C., Hauser, R., Prins, G. S., Soto, A. M., Zoeller, R. T., & Gore, A. C. (2009) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0002 · Cited by 4,585
Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3809006 · Cited by 1,557
Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004
Woodruff, T. J., Zota, A. R., & Schwartz, J. M. (2011) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1002727 · Cited by 930
Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes.
Singh, S., Sedgh, G., & Hussain, R. (2010) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x · Cited by 731
Price, M. J., Ades, A., Soldan, K., Welton, N. J., Macleod, J., Simms, I., DeAngelis, D., Turner, K. M., & Horner, P. J. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20220 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandra, A., Martinez, G. M., Mosher, W. D., Abma, J. C., & Jones, J.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2005
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 1-160
- OpenAlex
- W2394780319
- Cited by
- 956
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e414702008-001
- The paper
- Chandra, A., Martinez, G. M., Mosher, W. D., Abma, J. C., & Jones, J. (2005). Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e414702008-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.