The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research methods in psychology: (518432004-001)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Bolle, C. L., Hegner, S. M., & Kommers, P. A. M. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039 · Cited by 1,031
Building a model of local food consumption on trips and holidays: A grounded theory approach
Kim, Y. G., Eves, A., & Scarles, C. (2009) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.11.005 · Cited by 851
Distinctions between emotion and mood
Beedie, C., Terry, P., & Lane, A. (2005) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930541000057 · Cited by 593
The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality
Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/jba.2.2013.003 · Cited by 589
Chiri, G., & Warfield, M. E. (2012) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-011-0833-6 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2001
- OpenAlex
- W3110355109
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research methods in psychology: (518432004-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e518432004-001
- The paper
- Research methods in psychology: (518432004-001). (2001). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e518432004-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
