The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group: (548222006-001)
Abstract
The purpose of evaluating public health surveillance systems is to ensure that problems of public health importance are being monitored efficiently and effectively. CDC's Guidelines for Evaluating Surveillance Systems are being updated to address the need for a) the integration of surveillance and health information systems, b) the establishment of data standards, c) the electronic exchange of health data, and d) changes in the objectives of public health surveillance to facilitate the response of public health to emerging health threats (e.g., new diseases). This report provides updated guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems based on CDC's Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health, research and discussion of concerns related to public health surveillance systems, and comments received from the public health community. The guidelines in this report describe many tasks and related activities that can be applied to public health surveillance systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Missouri firearm-related injury surveillance system
Van Tuinen, M., & Crosby, A. (1998) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00064-6 · Cited by 7
Cited by
Olsen, M. H., Angell, S. Y., Asma, S., Boutouyrie, P., Burger, D., Chirinos, J. A., Damasceno, A., Delles, C., Gimenez-Roqueplo, A.-P., Hering, D., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31134-5 · Cited by 939
A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems
Chen, H., Hailey, D., Wang, N., & Yu, P. (2014) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph110505170 · Cited by 354
Uses of Electronic Health Records for Public Health Surveillance to Advance Public Health
Birkhead, G. S., Klompas, M., & Shah, N. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122747 · Cited by 345
Virus hazards from food, water and other contaminated environments
Rodríguez-Lázaro, D., Cook, N., Ruggeri, F. M., Sellwood, J., Nasser, A., Nascimento, M. S. J., D'Agostino, M., Santos, R., Saiz, J. C., Rzeżutka, A., et al. (2012) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00306.x · Cited by 316
Surveillance and response strategies for zoonotic diseases: a comprehensive review
Sharan, M., Vijay, D., Yadav, J. P., Bedi, J. S., & Dhaka, P. (2023) · Science in One Health · doi:10.1016/j.soh.2023.100050 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- RR-13
- Pages
- 1-35; quiz CE1
- OpenAlex
- W120152436
- Cited by
- 1,129
- References
- 1
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group: (548222006-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e548222006-001
- The paper
- Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group: (548222006-001). (2001). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e548222006-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
