Cited by 28Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

The short-term stability of life satisfaction judgments

Open access
Lucas, Richard E., Freedman, Vicki A., Cornman, Jennifer C.·2018·Emotion

Abstract

Life satisfaction judgments are thought to reflect people's overall evaluation of the quality of their lives as a whole. Because the circumstances of these lives typically do not change very quickly, life satisfaction judgments should be relatively stable over time. However, some evidence suggests that these judgments can be easily manipulated, which leads to low stability even over very short intervals. The current study uses a unique data set that includes multiple assessments of life satisfaction over both long (up to 4 years) and short (over the course of a single interview) intervals to assess whether information that is made salient during the course of an interview affects life satisfaction judgments at the end of the interview. Results suggest that this intervening information has only small effects on the final judgment and that placement within an interview has little influence on the judgment that people provide. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/emo0000357

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Diener E Suh EM Lucas RE Smith HL 1999 Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress Psychological Bulletin 125 276 302
  2. Sheldon KM Lucas RE 2014 Stability of happiness: Theories and evidence on whether happiness can change London Academic Press
  3. Strack F Martin LL Schwarz N 1988 Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction European Journal of Social Psychology 18 429 442

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucas, R. E., Freedman, V. A., & Cornman, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2018-10
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
1024-1031
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2752262326
Cited by
27
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P01AG029409; R01AG040715)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
life satisfaction, subjective well-being, self-assessment
MeSH terms
Humans, Judgment, Male, Personal Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review