Cited by 118Attachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Gender differences in the associations between relationship status, social support, and wellbeing

Stronge, Samantha, Overall, Nickola C., Sibley, Chris G.·2019·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

Extant research suggests that having a romantic partner has more benefits, in terms of higher subjective wellbeing, for men compared to women. The primary theoretical explanation for these wellbeing differences is that men's romantic partners tend to be their primary source of perceived social support. Yet, there is surprisingly little empirical evidence that perceived social support accounts for these gender differences. The current research used a national panel study in New Zealand (N = 20,774) to test whether perceived social support mediated the relationship between having a romantic partner and wellbeing and whether these associations were noninvariant across gender. Perceived social support partially mediated the association between having a romantic partner and higher wellbeing (life satisfaction and self-esteem), and this pathway was stronger for men than it was for women. These results extend previous research by using large-scale national panel survey data to show that the stronger association between men's relationship status and wellbeing is partially due to men's stronger connection between relationship status and perceived social support. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/fam0000540

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stronge, S., Overall, N. C., & Sibley, C. G.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Stronge, Samantha
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2019-10
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
819-829
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2945683949
Cited by
118
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
15.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Templeton Religion Trust (TRT0196)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
gender differences, relationship status, romantic partners, perceived social support, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, self-esteem, mediation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Sexual Partners, Social Support, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review