Gender differences in the associations between relationship status, social support, and wellbeing
Abstract
Extant research suggests that having a romantic partner has more benefits, in terms of higher subjective wellbeing, for men compared to women. The primary theoretical explanation for these wellbeing differences is that men's romantic partners tend to be their primary source of perceived social support. Yet, there is surprisingly little empirical evidence that perceived social support accounts for these gender differences. The current research used a national panel study in New Zealand (N = 20,774) to test whether perceived social support mediated the relationship between having a romantic partner and wellbeing and whether these associations were noninvariant across gender. Perceived social support partially mediated the association between having a romantic partner and higher wellbeing (life satisfaction and self-esteem), and this pathway was stronger for men than it was for women. These results extend previous research by using large-scale national panel survey data to show that the stronger association between men's relationship status and wellbeing is partially due to men's stronger connection between relationship status and perceived social support. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Men receive more partner support than women in different-gender relationships.
“This aligns with evidence that men receive more partner support than women in different-gender relationships (Stronge et al., 2019).”
From Grandparent Caregiving and Epigenetic Aging among Midlife and Older Adults in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as Stronge et al., 2019
Cites
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093 · see citing works
BERKMAN, L. F., & SYME, S. L. (1979) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674 · Cited by 5,341 · see citing works
Social Relationships and Health.
Cohen, S. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.8.676 · Cited by 4,852 · see citing works
Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
Courtenay, W. H. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1 · Cited by 4,091 · see citing works
Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking
Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.5 · Cited by 2,761 · see citing works
Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping
Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0601_1 · Cited by 1,807 · see citing works
Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory.
Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P. J., Gottfried, M., & Freitas, G. (2003) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3 · Cited by 1,295 · see citing works
Marital quality and personal well-being: a meta- analysis
Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x · Cited by 1,068 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grandparent Caregiving and Epigenetic Aging among Midlife and Older Adults in the United States
Bhat, A. C., Trexberg, K. M., Apsley, A. T., Almeida, D. M., & Shalev, I. (2026) · The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaf255 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“This aligns with evidence that men receive more partner support than women in different-gender relationships (Stronge et al., 2019).”
- Authors
- Stronge, S., Overall, N. C., & Sibley, C. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Stronge, Samantha
- Venue
- Journal of Family Psychology
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 819-829
- ISSN
- 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1293
- OpenAlex
- W2945683949
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Templeton Religion Trust (TRT0196)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- gender differences, relationship status, romantic partners, perceived social support, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, self-esteem, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Sexual Partners, Social Support, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review