Cited by 381Memory and Neural MechanismsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Factors determining vicarious extinction of avoidance behavior through symbolic modeling

Bandura, Albert, Menlove, Frances L.·1968·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0025260

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with dog phobia who watched models interact with several dogs showed more approach behavior at follow-up than those who watched a single dog.

    “Bandura and Menlove (1968) tested modeling for children with dog phobia and found that those who observed models interacting with multiple dogs of various sizes and breeds performed more approach behaviors at follow-up compared to children who observed modeled behavior with a single dog.”

    From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as Bandura & Menlove, 1968

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bandura, A., & Menlove, F. L.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1968
Volume
8
Issue
2, Pt.1
Pages
99-108
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2004088283
Cited by
379
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
avoidance behavior, symbolic modeling, observational learning, social learning
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Arousal, Avoidance Learning, Child, Preschool, Dogs, Emotions, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Methods, Models, Psychological, Motion Pictures, Parent-Child Relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review