Cited by 240Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Classical conditioning and the acquisition of human fears and phobias: A review and synthesis of the literature

Davey, Graham C.L·1992·Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0146-6402(92)90010-l

Cites

169 of 169 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 176 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davey, G. C. L.
Affiliations
City, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Davey, Graham C.L
Venue
Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
29-66
ISSN
0146-6402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089584834
Cited by
240
References
176
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
classical conditioning, phobia, fear, human conditioning, animal conditioning, conditioning model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review