The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.
Abstract
Ss overheard an epileptic seizure. They believed either that they alone heard the emergency, or that 1 or 4 unseen others were also present. As predicted the presence of other bystanders reduced the individual's feelings of personal responsibility and lowered his speed of reporting (p < .01). In groups of size 3, males reported no faster than females, and females reported no slower when the 1 other bystander was a male rather than a female. In general, personality and background measures were not predictive of helping. Bystander inaction in real-life emergencies is often explained by apathy, alienation, and anomie. This experiment suggests that the explanation may lie more in the bystander's response to other observers than in his indifference to the victim.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Darley and Latan e (1968) showed that people in larger groups feel less responsible and less personally addressed, which creates a bystander effect.”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Darley and Latan e (1968)
In the citing paper
“Despite macroinfluencers' sponsored posts being exposed to a larger number of users (De Veirman, Cauberghe, and Hudders 2017), people in larger groups feel less responsible and addressed and then stand by rather than act (Darley and Latan e 1968).”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Darley and Latan e 1968
Citations
Cites
Miller, N. E., & Dollar, D. (1944) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-194402000-00051 · Cited by 1,536
Child Training and Personality
Whiting, J. W. M., & Child, I. L. (1953) · Revista Mexicana de Sociología · doi:10.2307/3537788 · Cited by 643
Gallo, M. M. (2018) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9780801455902-005 · Cited by 110
Liking and Response to Dependency Relationships
Daniels, L. R., & Berkowitz, L. J. (1963) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872676301600203 · Cited by 86
Aronfreed, J. (1964) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0047689 · Cited by 60
Child Training and Personality
Stevenson, H. W., Whiting, J. W. M., & Child, I. L. (1954) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418513 · Cited by 59
Berkowitz, L. J., Klanderman, S. B., & Harris, R. (1964) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2785622 · Cited by 57
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,901–3,000 of 3,085
Bystander Intervention in Microaggressions in High School
Mirah, K., Jenkins, L. N., & Marks, L. R. (2025) · Contemporary School Psychology · doi:10.1007/s40688-025-00571-6
“This may be somewhat explained by the fact that with more bystanders present, the more likely people fail to intervene in a situation (Darley & Latané, 1968 ).”
Hoenow, N. C. (2025) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-025-09508-7
“Third, the feeling of accountability and responsibility for the group’s outcome may be more salient with real, identified partners, whereas it remains diffused in the non-disclosed condition, similar to a bystander effect (Darley and Latané 1968 ; Latané and Dabbs 1975; Latané and Nida 1981).”
Mair, S., Mostajeran, F., Llobera, J., Slater, M., & Steinicke, F. (2025) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR · doi:10.1109/ismar67309.2025.00152
From Bias to Behavior: Understanding the Theoretical Gaps in Diversity Training
Johansson, A. C., & Sell, J. A. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0882-614520250000042003
Sibling Dynamics in Adult Children's Support Across Parental Widowhood Phases in Korea
Chen, M., & Kim, D. (2025) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.70038
Promoting Prosocial Behavior Through “Everyday Heroism”
Olaoye, E. H., Zimbardo, P. G., & Feher, Z. M. (2022) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-64802-890-820251016
Group heterogeneity in occupational injury attribution amongst ride-hailing drivers
Zhang, T., Wei, J., & Li, Y. (2025) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2025.103428
Zhu, R., Wang, H., Feng, C., Yin, L., Zhang, R., Zeng, Y., & Liu, C. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.107223.2
Wang, B., Du, X., Zhu, T., Zhou, Z., Liu, X., & Ren, Z. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7913789/v1
Sequential Sampling by Individuals and Groups: An Experimental Study
Reshidi, P., Lizzeri, A., Yariv, L., et al. (2025) · American Economic Review Insights · doi:10.1257/aeri.20240055
“Similarly, diffusion of responsibility (Darley and Latan´e, 1968), suggesting individuals’ prefer not to affect the group’s choice, would push the second and third voters in the unanimity treatment to vote faster in order to avoid being pivotal, in contrast with our data.”
The situational Samaritan: How group reputation threat shapes reparatory behavior
von Schuckmann, J., Barros, L. S. G., Donnelly, G. E., & Bertini, M. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.70009
Htun, M., Tinkler, J., Dominguez, M. S., Mehdiabadi, A. H., Potter, S. J., Moschella, E. A., Wagner, J. F., & Jeduah, R. (2025) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231251391861
“Latané and Darley’s bystander intervention paradigm (Darley and Latané 1968; Latané and Darley 1969) explains the bystander effect, or why people frequently fail to inter-vene to help others in life-threatening emergencies such as violence, fires, and drowning.”
Jiang, L., Ye, B., Li, X., Zhang, W., Lan, Z., Liu, P., Sun, X., & Wu, H. (2025) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-025-05208-7
“Multiple studies report that unfamiliar, uncertain, and ambiguous situations can enhance the influence of DSN [47, 48].”
Harbusch, K., & Paschke, J. D. (2014) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09492-2_25
“In such precarious situations, the bystander-effect [4] is more likely to occur than immediate help, i.”
BackgroundThe Sage's Psychology: Confucianism Naturalized
Stephens, D. J. (2015)
False Beliefs, Partial Truths: Personal Myths and Ethical Blind Spots
Archer, C., & Hartman, L. P. (2012)
Dimoff, J. D. (2015) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Additional file 1 of Willingness to be the recipient during the dictator game
Hashimoto, H., Maeda, K., Yamamoto, K., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20364949
Additional file 2 of Willingness to be the recipient during the dictator game
Hashimoto, H., Maeda, K., Yamamoto, K., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20364952
Beyer, F., Travers, E., Haggard, P., & Sidarus, N. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Les 20 petites histoires des grandes théories de la psychologie sociale
Capuano, C., & Chekroun, P. (2025) · Dunod eBooks · doi:10.3917/dunod.bonet.2025.01.0120
SDG ENGAGEMENT BY MNEs THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL EXPOSURE AND HOME- COUNTRY CONTEXTPreprint
MONTES-SANCHO, M. J., & Nieto, M. J. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5765935
Current Themes in Behavioral Business Ethics
Simola, S. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-68123-466-320251009
Education and the culture of giving: Rural evidence from Bangladesh
Murshed, R. (2025) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2025.2581042
(2013) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-62396-438-220251012
Opportunities missed: The untapped potential in local U.S. newspapers’ appeals for financial support
Kananovich, V. (2025) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849251409242
“Due to the bystander effect — where individuals feel less compelled to take prosocial action when they perceive that others are already involved (Darley and Latan´e, 1968) — and the third-person effect, observed in people ’ s assessments of others ’ intentions to pay for news (Chyi et al., 2016),…”
Scapegoating in Healthcare: A Primitive Response to Tragedy
Gibbons, R. (2025) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00207640251398277
“A silence descends, echoing the bystander effect, where witnesses fail to intervene due to diffused responsibility and fear of judgement (Darley & Latané, 1968).”
Nickerson, A. B., Jenkins, L. N., & Fredrick, S. S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12370-1_5
Assuming Responsibility for Intervening and Taking Action
Nickerson, A. B., Jenkins, L. N., & Fredrick, S. S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12370-1_7
Who Defends and Who Stands By?
Nickerson, A. B., Jenkins, L. N., & Fredrick, S. S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12370-1_3
Nickerson, A. B., Jenkins, L. N., & Fredrick, S. S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12370-1_10
Völkermord vor Gericht – Wie internationale Urteile den Genozid entschlüsseln
Kolkilic, F. (2026) · Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform · doi:10.1515/mks-2025-0044
“…wird jeder Ebene erlaubt, die Verantwortung ab-zustreiten oder die eigene herunterzuspielen, um seiner Handlung eine nicht zu große Rolle bei den Verbrechen zukommen zu lassen – was auch schon als »diffusion of re-sponsibility« bekannt ist (Kelman 1973, 47; vgl. auch Darley & Latané 1968, 377 ff.).”
Ling, C., Kelty, S. F., & Tseung‐Wong, C. N. (2026) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-025-01005-w
Salimova, L., Nurbaeva, M. K., & Agbo, N. (2025) · Asean Social Work Journal · doi:10.58671/aswj.v13i2.139
“Research has shown that there is often a discrepancy between what people say they will do in a crisis and what they do when faced with such circumstances (Ajzen, 1991; Fishbein & Ajzen, 2010; Darley & Latané, 1968; Vlaev, 2012).”
Stress protection by your group – increasing group size reduces physiological stress contagion
Dorn, T., Auer, A., Walther, L.-M., Sauter, C., Bandle, E., & Wirtz, P. H. (2026) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2026.107747
Reasoning and empathy are not competing but complementary features of altruism
Law, K. F., Syropoulos, S., Amormino, P., Marsh, A. A., Young, L., & O’Connor, B. B. (2026) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag015
“One possibility is that it reflects an “empathic bystander effect” (76), wherein holding stronger beliefs about the malleability of empathy allows individuals to diffuse personal responsibility for addressing large-scale suffering.”
L’éthique professionnelle, clé de la confiance des hospitaliers envers leur préparation aux crises ?
Bossard, M., Fleureau, E., Dusserre, G., et al. (2026) · Éthique & Santé · doi:10.1016/j.etiqe.2026.01.001
Zhao, L. (2025) · Criminal Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.65603/cpsp01010003
Liu, C. H., Chiu, F.-C., Huang, P., Lin, T.-H., & Chang, C.-L. (2026) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2026-1-2
“Furthermore, this finding offers a refinement to the foundational Bystander Intervention Model (BIM; Darley & Latane, 1968), which primarily frames intervention as a sequential cognitive decision-making process.”
Decision Ownership and Deference to Healthcare AI
Slome, E. (2026) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-025-10518-4 · Cited by 1
“This diminished sense of responsibility can lead to a healthcare professional feeling less motivated to do her best work (Darley and Latane 1968; Dubov, Fraenkel, and Seng 2016; West 2000).”
Matsumoto, H., Igarashi, A., Takaoka, M., & Yoshioka‐Maeda, K. (2026) · Gerontology & Geriatrics Education · doi:10.1080/02701960.2026.2623601
Understanding the Efficacy of Online Bystander Intervention when Journalists are the TargetsPreprint
Searles, K., & Tromble, R. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6173923
Barriers to White Bystander Awareness and Anti‐Racist Action
(2026) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394310937.ch4
Conrad, C. A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-50316-1_4
Mishra, V., & Uppal, N. (2026) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011261425558
Latulipe, C., Anvik, J., Lin, K., Nowrin, S., Railing, B. P., Reckinger, S. J., & Zarnegar, A. (2025) · ITiCSE-WGR · doi:10.1145/3760545.3783964
“Also, as group size increases, there is less social pressure to contribute (a.k.a “bystander effect” [14]).”
Montanaro, E. A., Brienzo, M. J., Temple, J., et al. (2026) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaag001
Villa-Henao, D., Ojeda, M., Mora-Merchán, J. A., & Rey, R. D. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09085-7
“To date, most theoretical research on bystanders of sexual harassment has predominantly focused on offline contexts, often drawing on the classic model by Darley and Latané (1968) to explain the factors influencing indi - viduals’ decisions to intervene (or not) in violent situations.”
Song, H., Konrad, F., Abrams, A. M. H., Tsarskaia, N., & Pütten, A. M. R.-V. D. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100268
Zhang, W., Cao, L., He, R., Yang, T., & Zhu, L. (2026) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/01650254261419704
Nexø, L. A., & Liebst, L. S. (2026) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2026.2632677 · Cited by 1
Johnson, M., Ahn, B. “., Dutil, C., Matin, N., Sun, N., Grewal, K., & Harley, J. M. (2026) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000900
Hynes, K., & Banks, B. M. (2026) · Race and Social Problems · doi:10.1007/s12552-026-09500-5
Cerdán-Torregrosa, A., Goicolea, I., Parra‐Casado, D. L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605261426591
Kim, J., Park, J., Park, M., Ahn, C. R., & Lee, I. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6367470
Psychologically Grounded Robot with Prosocial Behavior for HRI in Life-Threatening Scenarios
Suen, C. W. K., & Zou, Z. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3776734.3794366
Liu, Y. K., Bradford, B., & Ristea, A. (2026) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-026-01094-1
Conflict Management and Team Motivation
Thompson, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51650-4_240-1
Oesterle, D. W., Maloney, M., Fortson, K., Mennicke, A. M., & Montanaro, E. A. (2026) · Journal of Prevention · doi:10.1007/s10935-026-00903-z
Affiliation as a Social Tension Buffer in the Aftermath of Street Fights
Pighini, L., Norscia, I., Lindegaard, M. R., & Pallante, V. (2026) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-026-09516-1
“In humans, the study of bystanders’ behaviour primarily took place in laboratory settings, with a focus on bystanders as “inactive” agents and on the factors inhibiting their actions (Darley & Latané, 1968 ).”
Liu, Y. K., Bradford, B., & Ristea, A. (2026) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-026-01088-z
The Ethics of Robin Hoodism: When Managers Take Injustice into Their Own Hands
Dodson, S. J., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06273-0
Villa-Henao, D., Ojeda, M., Muñoz‐Fernández, N., Rey, R. D., & Mora-Merchán, J. A. (2026) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-025-03384-z
“One possible explanation for this phenomenon is the bystander effect, where individuals are less likely to act in an emergency or problematic situation when others are present (Darley & Latane, 1968).”
Kovalchuk, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6227699
Hristova, V., Haralampiev, K., Vlaev, I., et al. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16040511
“One potential explanation is the diffusion of responsibility, a well-established phenomenon in social psychology whereby individuals are less likely to take action when responsibility is perceived to be shared among many actors (Darley & Latane, 1968).”
Vers une éthique de l'empathie
Semedo, M. L. L. (2012) · doi:10.70675/4eb279d4zc7e0z4dc2za26fzebb27e07fe72
Scheffer, M. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009699785.013
Exploring the Effects of Third-Party Explanations in Multi-Agent Settings After an AI Refusal
Yamamoto, K., Yang, C.-L., Tanikawa, T., et al. (2026) · Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798502
“Furthermore, responsibility for the explanation can be blurred when social actors increase in a social setting [2].”
InfluentialBae, I., Bazarova, N. N., Zhao, P., Hui, W., Kizilcec, R. F., & Margolin, D. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6613903
The impact of video speed on intention attribution
Schütz, L.-M., Betsch, T., & Plessner, H. (2026) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103140
Leveraging AI for Direct Bystander Intervention Against Cyberbullying
Qin, P., Cheng, J., Lee, J., Zhang, J., Liu, Z., & Lee, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3816963
“These findings enrich the CSCW community’s understanding of cyberbullying intervention [31] (Section 5.1) and complement existing intervention methods (Section 5.2), including through prosocial design [8, 44, 54, 116], educational approaches [64, 95], and automatic methods [70, 113].”
InfluentialThe Peculiarities of Interpersonal Relations among Participants of BullyingPreprint
Khodirova, O., Mullabaeva, N., Nishanov, S., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8249757/v1
Arai, K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-5421-8_12
Effectiveness at Work as a Construct for Personnel Selection
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197809013.003.0023
Bystander effect emerges from individual psychological prospects
Ng, T., & Clifton, S. M. (2026) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/5.0323615
“Metrics of interest have included not only the intervention rate, but also latency of reaction [4, 28] and the extent of action taken [29, 30].”
Gilles-Noguès, E., Mégalakaki, O., Calo-Pravaz, G., & Cruz, G. V. (2026) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2026.2654766
Igarashi, Y., Norii, T., Nakanishi, H., Suga, R., Nakae, R., Yokobori, S., Yoshiike, S., Shiroto, K., Kobayashi, T., Kikuchi, H., et al. (2026) · Resuscitation Plus · doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2026.101342
“13,14 In OHCA, these effects may be attenuated because the expected response consists of highly standardized and widely disseminated actions (e.g., call for help, start compressions, use an AED) 4,5 and because visible enabling infrastructure exists, including AED placement and sig-nage.”
To intervene or not to intervene: Actual and intended bystander responses to sextortion
Pijlman, V. (2026) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2026.102661
Resonances to improve environmental and natural resources management
Glynn, P. D., Cerrutti, M. E. S., Cockerill, K., Glynn, S. A., White, P., Drummond, J. K., & Penton, J. (2026) · Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1080/1943815x.2026.2658596
Can We Prime for Compassion and Other Virtues? The Impact of the Good Samaritan Parable
Plante, T. G., Lopez, T., Joseph, A., Gustavel, I., & Ioffe, K. (2026) · Pastoral Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11089-026-01331-w
CogHelp: A cognitive architecture for simulating helping behavior in emergencies
Huang, X., Liu, T., Liu, Z., et al. (2026) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2026.101476
Zhou, X., Chen, Y., & Xiao, H. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1718104
“In a bullying scenario, just as it occurs in schools, the bystander effect implies that individuals can intervene as a group because of the presence of others and that people tend to expect others to take action (Darley and Latané, 1968).”
Mental health in challenging situations: how experienced agency affects coping and mental distress
Benz, L., Pfister, R., & Schwarz, K. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1786909
“Improving access to and reducing stigma around professional mental health services across different contexts could play a key role here—ideally framed as empowering support for self-help, ultimately fostering more sustained active coping.”
Uncovering Routes to Psychological Ownership in Container Security
Suomi, T., Sroor, M., Ihantola, P., et al. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23883-2_32
Zarzycki, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2026.1752723
Sustainable apparel purchase intention from the moral emotion perspective
Le, M. T. T. (2026) · Journal of Economics and Development · doi:10.1108/jed-12-2025-0891
Das syndimensionale Handlungsfeld – Psyche und Individuum
Maurer, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-51247-7_7
Climate literacy and the perception of climate-sustainability in the Nordic countries
Ala-Mantila, S., Heinonen, J. T., Anttonen, H., & Árnadóttir, Á. (2026) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-026-10328-y
“In the absence of visible collective engagement, individuals may hesitate to act, reflecting the bystander effect (Darley and Latané 1968 ; Booth 2012 ; Kalch et al. 2021), where the perceived lack of pro-climate behaviors by others reduces the likelihood of one’s own actions.”
A Textual Political Imagination
Carriere, K. R. (2018) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-64113-473-620251003
Understanding the efficacy of online bystander intervention when journalists are the targets
Searles, K., & Tromble, R. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2026.109062
Metadata
- Authors
- Darley, J. M., & Latane, B.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1968
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4, Pt.1
- Pages
- 377-383
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2171602877
- Semantic Scholar
- a17d8ee9f157ebeb2f520406c1d79346ceb532c8
- Cited by
- 3,083
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 158 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 175 · 2018: 168 · 2017: 131 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 138 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 99
- FWCI
- 113.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Keywords
- bystander intervention, diffusion of responsibility, emergency situations, helping behavior, personal responsibility, group size, gender differences, apathy, anomie, alienation
- MeSH terms
- Character, Conflict, Psychological, Decision Making, Emergencies, Female, Group Processes, Group Structure, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Perception, Psychology, Social, Reaction Time, Sex Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
