Cited by 108Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making StudiesOrganizational Management and LeadershipCorporate Finance and Governance

Corporate decision making: An empirical study.

Stagner, Ross.·1969·Journal of Applied Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0026849

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stagner, R.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Stagner, Ross.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
1969-02
Volume
53
Issue
1, Pt.1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2049566237
Cited by
108
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
Keywords
corporate decision-making, management decision-making, organizational decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review