The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships.
Abstract
The present paper attempts to present a review of the experimental findings dealing with the posture and position of a communicator relative to his attitude and status to his addressee. More studies are available which exhibit the detailed functional relationships of posture and position variables to com-municator attitudes than to communicator-addressee relative status. Distance, eye contact, body orientation, arms-akimbo position, and trunk relaxation have been found most consistently to be indicators of communicator attitude toward an addressee. These variables along with the degree of arm openness of female communicators and degree of asymmetry in the arrangement of arms and legs have been found or hypothesized to be associated with status relationships with the addressee. The present paper is an attempt to sum-marize investigations of the significance of the posture, distance, and orientation of com-municators toward addressees as possible in-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Inference of attitudes from the posture, orientation, and distance of a communicator.
Mehrabian, A. (1968) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025906 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Cited by
Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.
Snyder, M. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037039 · Cited by 3,402
Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.
Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.10.867 · Cited by 853
The Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression
Niedenthal, P. M., Mermillod, M., Maringer, M., & Hess, U. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000865 · Cited by 618
Choi, H.-H., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6 · Cited by 413
Group rapport: posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator
Lafrance, M., & Broadbent, M. (1976) · Group & Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/105960117600100307 · Cited by 222
Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00979 · Cited by 210
The effect of postural lean and body congruence on the judgment of psychotherapeutic rapport.
Trout, D. L., & Rosenfeld, H. M. (1980) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf00986818 · Cited by 135
Please, tell me about yourself: automatic personality assessment using short self-presentations
Batrinca, L. M., Mana, N., Lepri, B., Pianesi, F., & Sebe, N. (2011) · Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces · doi:10.1145/2070481.2070528 · Cited by 96
Kleck, R. E., & Rubenstein, C. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076243 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Mehrabian, A.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1969
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 359-372
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1992114466
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
