The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning.
Abstract
The present paper develops a theory to specify in part how a person stores and searches through information retained from sentences. The theory states that (a) functional relations, like the abstract subject-predicate relation which underlies sentences, are more available from memory than other, less basic kinds of information; (6) certain positive adjectives, like long, are stored in memory in a less complex and more accessible form than their opposites, like short; and (c) listeners can only retrieve, from memory, information which is congruent at a deep level to the information they are searching for. The present theory, unlike previous ones, correctly predicts the principal differences in the solution times of 8 types of two-term series problems and 32 types of three-term series problems (e.g., // John isn't as bad as Pete, and Dick isn't as good as Pete, then who is worst?). It also accounts for previous observations on children solving these problems and explains other phenomena in deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning has often been studied in particular types of reasoning problems. The strategies suggested for their solution have therefore often been of limited generality : they apply in one kind of problem and that kind alone. The present paper proposes, instead, that reasoning is accomplished mainly through certain very general linguistic processes, the same mental operations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Cited by
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Visual Information Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-170150-5.50011-1 · Cited by 1,419
Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08003543 · Cited by 1,174
Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers.
Casasanto, D. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0015854 · Cited by 871
A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization.
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.220 · Cited by 567
Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning.
Galotti, K. M. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.331 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, H. H.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1969-07
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387-404
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2117958466
- Cited by
- 650
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0027578
- The paper
- Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.