The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of self-esteem, perceived performance, and choice on causal attributions.
Abstract
Heider (1958) described a model of the cognitive process people use in structuring their environment through causal attribution. In Heider's model, a person engaged in an activity attributes the outcome to one or more internal or external causal sources. Current research suggests a number of personality and situational variables which may affect a person's causal attributions, including self-esteem, perceived performance, and choice. The high-self-esteem person has been conceptualized as liking or valuing himself, as well as seeing himself as competent in dealing with the world he perceives (Cohen, 1959; Combs & Snygg, 1959). The low-self-esteem person is seen as disliking, devaluing himself, and in general perceiving himself as not competent to deal effectively with his environment. Two partially contradictory hypotheses may be derived from self theory. The first is that persons are motivated to perceive events in a way which enhances chronic self-esteem. The second is that persons are motivated to perceive events in a way which is consistent with chronic self-esteem. These two contradictory hypotheses regarding self-esteem and interpretation of event outcomes may be inte1 This study is based primarily on a dissertation submitted to Purdue University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree. 2 Requests for reprints should be sent to the author, School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66044.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Cited by
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
Ross, L. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3 · Cited by 4,170
Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076486 · Cited by 2,575
A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences
Weiner, B. (1979) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3 · Cited by 2,453
Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.5 · Cited by 2,378
Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.
Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895 · Cited by 2,007
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitch, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1970
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 311-315
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2155137177
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of self-esteem, perceived performance, and choice on causal attributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0029847
- The paper
- Fitch, G. (1970). Effects of self-esteem, perceived performance, and choice on causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029847
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.