The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments.
Abstract
The time needed for adults to indicate which of. two digits is larger, which of two digits is smaller, and which of two letters appears later in the alphabet was studied in three experiments. Latencies in both digit tasks were primarily a linear increasing function of the minimum digit of each pair, with responses for indicating the larger digit approximately 40 msec, faster than those for indicating the smaller digit. Latencies for the letter task were approximately 200-300 msec, longer than the reaction times for digits. Furthermore, the pattern of latencies for individual letter pairs was substantially different from the patterns for corresponding digit pairs, suggesting underlying process differences for the two types of material. Moyer and Landauer (1967) investigated the time required to judge which of two simultaneously presented digits is larger and found latencies to be a monotonically decreasing function of the absolute numeri-cal difference (Split) between the digits. Fairbank (1969) replicated this finding and, furthermore, found similar results when either months of the year or letters of the alphabet were substituted for digits. In addition, Fairbank showed that when 5s are required to select the smaller of two simultaneously presented digits, more time
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2151519a0 · Cited by 2,068
Cited by
Eye fixations and cognitive processes
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3 · Cited by 1,730
Preverbal and verbal counting and computation
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90050-r · Cited by 1,373
Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.
Dehaene, S., Emmanuel Dupoux, A., & Mehler, J. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.16.3.626 · Cited by 888
A chronometric analysis of simple addition.
Groen, G. J., & Parkman, J. M. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0032950 · Cited by 668
Self-citationDifferential Contributions of the Left and Right Inferior Parietal Lobules to Number Processing
Chochon, F., Cohen, L., Moortele, P. F. V. D., & Dehaene, S. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563689 · Cited by 591
Metadata
- Authors
- Parkman, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Published
- 1971
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-205
- ISSN
- 0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032895136
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0031854
- The paper
- Parkman, J. M. (1971). Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.