Cited by 198Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesHuman Resource Development and Performance EvaluationCognitive Abilities and Testing

Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods.

Naylor, James C., Briggs, George E.·1963·Journal of Experimental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0041060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Part-task approaches are not very suitable for learning complex tasks requiring much coordination between their distinct parts or constituent skills.

    “But Naylor and Briggs (1963) already indicated in the early 1960s that they are not very suitable for learning complex tasks requiring much coordination between their distinct parts or constituent skills.”

    From Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning (2003) · cites this paper as Naylor and Briggs (1963)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naylor, J. C., & Briggs, G. E.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
1963-03
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
217-224
ISSN
0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021623893
Cited by
198
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
task complexity, task organization, relative efficiency, training methods, skill acquisition
MeSH terms
Humans, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review