Cited by 266Academic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPsychology Research and BibliometricsLanguage and cultural evolution

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture.

Jacobs, Robert C., Campbell, Donald T.·1961·The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0044182

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 266

Metadata

Authors
Jacobs, R. C., & Campbell, D. T.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Published
1961-05
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
649-658
ISSN
0096-851X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115224549
Cited by
264
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
intergenerational transmission, cultural transmission, social learning
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychology, Social

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review