The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement of experimentally induced affects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spielberger, C. D. (1972) · Anxiety · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-657401-2.50009-5 · Cited by 1,102
Social comparison on Facebook: Motivation, affective consequences, self-esteem, and Facebook fatigue
Cramer, E. M., Song, H., & Drent, A. M. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.049 · Cited by 240
Mood Fluctuations: Women Versus Men and Menstrual Versus Other Cycles
McFarlane, J., Martin, C. L., & Williams, T. M. (1988) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00937.x · Cited by 93
El Ghoch, M., Calugi, S., & Dalle Grave, R. (2016) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu8070402 · Cited by 36
“Changes in anxiety, depression, and hostility associated with the two diets were assessed using the three respective scales of the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist (MAACL) [60], and psychological wellbeing and self-esteem with the Tennessee Self Concept Scale (TSC) [61].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Zuckerman, M., Lubin, B., Vogel, L., & Valerius, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting Psychology
- Published
- 1964-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 418-425
- ISSN
- 0095-8891 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003247024
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of experimentally induced affects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0045367
- The paper
- Zuckerman, M., Lubin, B., Vogel, L., & Valerius, E. (1964). Measurement of experimentally induced affects. Journal of Consulting Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
