Cited by 164Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Incubation of creative performance and specific associative priming.

Mednick, Martha T., Mednick, Sarnoff A., Mednick, Edward V.·1964·The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0045994

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mednick, M. T., Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, E. V.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Published
1964-07
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
84-88
ISSN
0096-851X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974878808
Cited by
164
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
creative performance, incubation, associative priming, creative thinking, problem solving
MeSH terms
Creativity, Humans, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review