The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faking by sales applicants of a forced choice personality inventory
Bass, B. M. (1957) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044670 · Cited by 45
Cited by
Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000085 · Cited by 677
Antecedents to Customer Expectations for Service Recovery
Kelley, S. W., & Davis, M. A. (1994) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070394221005 · Cited by 673
Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.199 · Cited by 567
Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory
Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002 · Cited by 554
A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions
DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(84)90029-1 · Cited by 444
McKnight, P. E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.005 · Cited by 400
Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis
Paris, C. R., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130050084879 · Cited by 308
Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings.
Holzbach, R. L. (1978) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.579 · Cited by 249
Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate
Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2015.106 · Cited by 230
Progress in resolving problems: A problem-focused style of coping.
Heppner, P. P., Cook, S. W., Wright, D. M., & Johnson, W. C. (1995) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.42.3.279 · Cited by 205
Wang, L.-F., & Heppner, P. P. (2002) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/00100002030004006 · Cited by 128
Brink, K. E., & Costigan, R. D. (2015) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2013.0044 · Cited by 110
Playfulness in adulthood as a personality trait: a reconceptualization and a new measurement
Shen, X. S., Chick, G., & Zinn, H. (2014) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.1080/00222216.2014.11950313 · Cited by 73
Graen, G., Dansereau, F., & Minami, T. (1972) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(72)90050-5 · Cited by 42
Do you remember? Rater memory systems and leadership measurement
Hansbrough, T. K., Lord, R. G., Schyns, B., Foti, R. J., Liden, R. C., & Acton, B. P. (2021) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101455 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, P. C., & Kendall, L. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1963-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-155
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W1974717757
- Cited by
- 837
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
