Cited by 400Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

The importance of functional impairment to mental health outcomes: a case for reassessing our goals in depression treatment research

Open access
McKnight, Patrick E., Kashdan, Todd B.·2009·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Outcomes in depression treatment research include both changes in symptom severity and functional impairment. Symptom measures tend to be the standard outcome but we argue that there are benefits to considering functional outcomes. An exhaustive literature review shows that the relationship between symptoms and functioning remains unexpectedly weak and often bidirectional. Changes in functioning often lag symptom changes. As a result, functional outcomes might offer depression researchers more critical feedback and better guidance when studying depression treatment outcomes. The paper presents a case for the necessity of both functional and symptom outcomes in depression treatment research by addressing three aims-1) review the research relating symptoms and functioning, 2) provide a rationale for measuring both outcomes, and 3) discuss potential artifacts in measuring functional outcomes. The three aims are supported by an empirical review of the treatment outcome and epidemiological literatures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.005

Cites

230 of 230 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bech P 1998 Quality of life in the psychiatric patient London Mosby-Wolfe
  2. Hatfield E Cacioppo J Rapson R 1994 Emotional contagion New York Cambridge University Press
  3. Paykel E 1999 Social functioning and the depressed patient International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice 3 1 S9 S11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKnight, P. E., & Kashdan, T. B.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
McKnight, Patrick E.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
243-259
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971568036
Cited by
400
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH073937, MH-73937)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR047595)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depression, functional disability, mental health outcomes, symptom severity, treatment outcome measures, measurement artifacts
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Employment, Feedback, Goals, Health Status, Humans, Psychology, Research, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review