The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Traumatic avoidance learning: the outcomes of several extinction procedures with dogs.
Abstract
HE persistence of behavior with no obvious reinforcement poses special problems for theories of learning. But numerous experimental studies confirm the clinical observation that traumatically acquired habits maintain a marked resistance to extinction despite the lack of renewed primary reinforcement (3, 4, 6, 8). The generality of the problem has been indicated by Mowrer(9), who formulates as the central problem of neurosis the paradoxical perpetuation of nonadaptive behavior. The present research deals with the extinction of a habit acquired under the conditions of traumatic avoidance learning. The habit proved to be markedly resistant to the ordinary extinction procedure. However, extinction could be brought about through the use of special techniques. The obtained data suggested theoretical explanations of high resistance to extinction as well as explanations of the relative efficacy of the special techniques. We presume that die findings have a wide generality for theories of therapy and the nature of psychological trauma. The findings to be reported in this paper were obtained under the following conditions. Using a modification of the Mowrer-Miller shuttlebox, learned avoidance responses were established in normal mongrel dogs. Under the impetus of very intense (just subtetanizing) electric shock, the dogs were trained to jump over a barrier from one compartment to the other in order to avoid the shock. The details of the training procedure are given in another paper (13). Ten trials comprised each day's session. After the animals had met an acquisition criterion of 10 successive responses on a given day, different dogs were
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, N. E. (1948) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058455 · Cited by 537
Cited by
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1
Rogers, R. W. (1975) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 · Cited by 6,805
Addiction motivation reformulated: an affective processing model of negative reinforcement
Baker, T. B., Piper, M. E., McCarthy, D. E., Majeskie, M. R., & Fiore, M. C. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.33 · Cited by 2,162
Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective
Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3524 · Cited by 2,007
A modern learning theory perspective on the etiology of panic disorder.
Bouton, M. E., Mineka, S., & Barlow, D. H. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.4 · Cited by 1,017
The psychological treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Abramowitz, J. S. (2006) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370605100702 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Solomon, R. L., Kamin, L. J., & Wynne, L. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1953-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 291-302
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997194532
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Traumatic avoidance learning: the outcomes of several extinction procedures with dogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0058943
- The paper
- Solomon, R. L., Kamin, L. J., & Wynne, L. C. (1953). Traumatic avoidance learning: the outcomes of several extinction procedures with dogs. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058943
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.