Cited by 2,007Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective

Open access
Grupe, Dan W., Nitschke, Jack B.·2013·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Uncertainty about a possible future threat disrupts our ability to avoid it or to mitigate its negative impact and thus results in anxiety. Here, we focus the broad literature on the neurobiology of anxiety through the lens of uncertainty. We identify five processes that are essential for adaptive anticipatory responses to future threat uncertainty and propose that alterations in the neural instantiation of these processes result in maladaptive responses to uncertainty in pathological anxiety. This framework has the potential to advance the classification, diagnosis and treatment of clinical anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn3524

Cites

226 of 226 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to Grupe's uncertainty and anticipation model of anxiety (UAMA) theory, the overestimation of threat costs and probabilities causes exaggerated emotional and behavioral reactivity in anxious individuals.

    “According to Grupe's “uncertainty and anticipation model of anxiety” (UAMA) theory (23), the overestimation of threat costs and probabilities causes exaggerated emotional and behavioral reactivity in anxious individuals”

    From Anticipatory threat responses mediate the relationship between mindfulness and anxiety: A cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

    The UAMA section links elevated threat expectancies to greater behavioral reactivity and heightened anticipatory emotional responses; the section on inflated estimates also links biased cost and probability estimates to anticipatory distress. The source bounds these responses to uncertainty about potential threats, whereas the citing sentence presents the causal claim without that condition. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Limited habituation in mPFC biases information processing towards negative/threatening frameworks; individuals for whom this system is working more typically may be less susceptible to anxiety even if diagnosed with ASD.

    “As noted by Grupe and Nitschke (2013), limited habituation in mPFC biases information processing towards negative/threatening frameworks; individuals for whom this system is working more typically may be less susceptible to anxiety even if they are diagnosed with ASD.”

    From Sensory, emotional and cognitive contributions to anxiety in autism spectrum disorders (2017) · cites this paper as Grupe and Nitschke, 2013

    The ‘Deficient safety learning’ section links altered vmPFC–amygdala function to fear generalization and notes possible benefits of preserved ACC/vmPFC regulatory function. The ‘Increased threat attention and hypervigilance’ section describes a bias toward interpreting uncertainty as threatening, but attributes it to indiscriminate amygdala activation, not limited mPFC habituation. Our copy does not establish the claimed habituation mechanism or address whether more typical function reduces anxiety susceptibility in people with ASD. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Disruptions to this network may lead to more vivid or visceral simulations of potential events and heighten a bias towards threat especially in uncertain situations.

    “Disruptions to this network may then lead to “more vivid or visceral simulations of potential events” (p. 492) and heighten a bias towards threat especially in uncertain situations.”

    From Sensory, emotional and cognitive contributions to anxiety in autism spectrum disorders (2017) · cites this paper as Grupe and Nitschke, 2013

    In “Increased threat attention and hypervigilance” (page not provided), the paper says anxious individuals are biased to interpret uncertainty as threatening and describes a network linking threat attention to the valuation of future events. The cited copy does not contain the quoted phrase “more vivid or visceral simulations of potential events” or establish that network disruptions produce such simulations. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Medial orbitofrontal cortex and insula provide information about the subjective value of potential events, balancing an individual's feelings of probable risk separate from a reasoned consideration of risk.

    “A seminal article on the neurobiology of IU (Grupe and Nitschke, 2013) suggests that medial orbitofrontal cortex and insula provide information about the subjective value of potential events, balancing an individual’s feelings of probable risk separate from a reasoned consideration of risk.”

    From Sensory, emotional and cognitive contributions to anxiety in autism spectrum disorders (2017) · cites this paper as Grupe and Nitschke, 2013

    In ‘Inflated estimates of threat cost and probability,’ the paper says orbitofrontal cortex activity reflects anticipated cost and represents the expected value of future states. In ‘Heightened reactivity to threat uncertainty,’ it proposes that the anterior insula contributes to subjective predictions of threat and describes a dissociation between feelings of threat and cognitive threat calculations. It does not say that the medial orbitofrontal cortex and insula jointly balance feelings of risk against reasoned risk assessment. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both crises bring uncertainty, loss, and change, and induce grief, anxiety, and distress.

    “Both crises bring uncertainty, loss, and change, and induce grief, anxiety, and distress.8”

    From Psychological responses, mental health, and sense of agency for the dual challenges of climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic in young people in the UK: an online survey study (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

    The paper’s ‘Uncertainty, unpredictability, and uncontrollability’ section links uncertainty to anxiety, and ‘Inflated estimates of threat cost and probability’ links uncertain negative outcomes to anticipatory distress (page numbers unavailable). It does not establish that the two crises involve loss and change or induce grief. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TR) American Psychiatric Association Washington, DC 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Nitschke, Jack B.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2013-06-20
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
488-501
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2004873925
Cited by
2,007
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 243 · 2025: 207 · 2024: 199 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 232 · 2021: 255 · 2020: 159 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 3
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh082130-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K02‑MH082130, R01MH074847, R01-MH74847)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
anxiety, uncertainty, anticipation, threat anticipation, neurobiology of anxiety, anticipatory responses, anxiety treatment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Attention, Brain, Decision Making, Humans, Neurobiology, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review