Cited by 371Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The psychological treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Open access
Abramowitz, Jonathan S·2006·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

The psychological treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) with exposure and response prevention (ERP) methods is one of the great success stories within the field of mental health. Within the span of about 20 years, the prognosis for individuals with OCD has changed from poor to very good as a result of the development of ERP. This success not withstanding, the procedures are far from perfect because a substantial minority of patients still either refuse treatment, drop out prematurely, or fail to benefit. I begin this article with a review of the development of ERP from early animal research on avoidance learning conducted during the 1950s. Next, I discuss the mechanisms of ERP. The bulk of the article reviews the treatment-outcome literature on ERP for OCD and includes comparisons with cognitive therapy—the “new kid on the block” with respect to psychological treatments for OCD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/070674370605100702

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT treatments that include CT interventions appear to be more tolerated by patients and to reduce dropout, compared to ERP alone.

    “Cognitive therapy (CT) is effective, too, in treating OCD, both alone and in combination with ERP, and CBT treatments that include CT interventions appear to be more tolerated by patients and to reduce dropout, compared to ERP alone (Abramowitz, 2006; Fisher & Wells, 2005; Rector et al., 2019; Rosa-Alcázar et al., 2008; Whittal et al., 2008).”

    From TREATING GUILT-INDUCING SELF-TALK IN OCD WITH DRAMATIZED SOCRATIC DIALOGUE: A STEP BY STEP INTERVENTION (2024) · cites this paper as Abramowitz, 2006

    The “Adding CT to ERP” section reports that including CT reduced dropout and says cognitive interventions can help patients comply with ERP. It does not establish that CT-containing treatment is better tolerated, and the dropout comparison was ERP plus relaxation therapy, not ERP alone. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CBT is only about 50% effective when treatment refusal, drop-out, and non-response are considered.

    “However, treatment success remains around 50% when refusal and dropout are considered.”

    From A preliminary investigation of the relationships between attachment insecurity, fear of compassion, and <scp>OCD</scp> severity (2025) · cites this paper as Abramowitz, 2006

    The Predictors of Improvement section (page unavailable) says about 50% of patients referred with OCD are not significantly improved with ERP, accounting for dropout and non-response. It does not say that treatment refusal was included in that figure, and its estimate concerns ERP specifically rather than CBT generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many ERP trials used the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale as an outcome measure, which is viewed as the gold standard for OCD symptom severity.

    “A strength of many ERP trials was the use of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS; Goodman, Price et al, 1989 a; b) as an outcome measure. This clinician-administered tool is viewed as the gold standard for ascertaining OCD symptom severity (Abramowitz, 2006; Summerfeldt, 2001).”
  • According to cognitive models, faulty beliefs give rise to obsessional anxiety, and compulsive acts are performed to ameliorate intrusive thoughts and anxiety.

    “according to cognitive models, faulty beliefs give rise to obsessional anxiety. Compulsive acts are then performed to ameliorate intrusive thoughts and anxiety”
  • Cognitive therapy was developed to target these cognitive biases and involves teaching patients about the implausibility and maladaptive nature of these cognitions.

    “To target these cognitive biases, “cognitive therapy” was developed (Rosa‐Alcázar et al., 2008). Cognitive therapy typically involves teaching patients about the implausibility and maladaptive nature of these cognitions”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. Foa EB, Kozak MJ, Goodman WK, Hollander E, Jenike MA, Rasmussen S. DSM-IV field trial: obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:90 -6.
  2. [45]45. Address for correspondence: Dr J Abramowitz, OCD/Anxiety Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St, SW, Rochester, MN, 55905; abramowitz.jonathan@mayo.edu. W Can J Psychiatry, Vol 51, No 7, June 2006 416 The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-In Review Résumé : Le traitement psychologique du trouble obsessionnel-compulsif Le traitement psychologique du trouble obsessionnel-compulsif (TOC) à l'aide de méthodes d'exposition avec prévention de la réponse (EPR) est une des grandes réussites du domaine de la santé mentale. En l'espace de quelque 20 ans, le pronostic des personnes souffrant de TOC est passé de médiocre à très bon, par suite de la mise au point de l'EPR. Nonobstant ce succès, les interventions sont loin d'être parfaites, car une minorité substantielle de patients soit refusent le traitement, soit abandonnent prématurément, soit n'en retirent aucun bénéfice. Cet article commence par un sommaire de l'élaboration de l'EPR, depuis les premières recherches zootechniques sur l'apprentissage de l'évitement, menées dans les années 1950. Ensuite, je présente les mécanismes de l'EPR. La majorité de l'article passe en revue la documentation des résultats du traitement par l'EPR pour le TOC et comprend des comparaisons avec la thérapie cognitive, la « nouvelle venue » au sein des traitements psychologiques du TOC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abramowitz, J. S.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Abramowitz, Jonathan S
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2006-06
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
407-416
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2131506339
Cited by
371
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 23
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, exposure and response prevention, cognitive therapy, avoidance learning, treatment outcomes, treatment discontinuation, treatment resistance
MeSH terms
Combined Modality Therapy, Desensitization, Psychologic, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review