Cited by 52Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The relation of affective tone to the retention of experiences of daily life.

Waters, R. H., Leeper, R.·1936·Journal of Experimental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0062328

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Waters and Leeper concluded that intensity was positively related to retention, whereas valence was unrelated.

    “Waters and Leeper (1936) were the first to include subject-rated intensity in their study of emotional effects on memory and concluded that intensity was positively related to retention, whereas valence was unrelated.”

    From Emotional Intensity Predicts Autobiographical Memory Experience (2004) · cites this paper as Waters & Leeper, 1936

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waters, R. H., & Leeper, R.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
1936-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
203-215
ISSN
0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031554298
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
emotional tone, emotional valence, memory retention, everyday experience, emotional arousal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review