The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studies in retention.
Abstract
The present investigation was planned with special reference to (1) the effect of recall on retention, (2) the relationship between the rate of forgetting and the ability of the subjects, and (3) the effect of item difficulty on the form of retention curves. PROBLEM The importance of retention is shown by the fact that growth or improvement in skills, knowledges, and attitudes is dependent upon the learner's retention of the effects of previous experience. The use of recall as an aid to retention has been emphasized by theorists on methods of study and by investigators in the field of memory. The lack of experimental evidence on the effect of recall on retention where conditions approach those of actual schoolroom practice prompted this investigation. The primary purpose of the investigation was to determine the effect of recall on retention of facts which children acquire through reading when the materials and the methods of study are similar to those used in classroom situations. Two subsidiary problems of the investigation relate to the effect of item difficulty upon the form of retention curves and to the relationship between the learning ability of the students and the rate of forgetting. Related Research.—A number of experimental studies have dealt with various aspects of the problem of this investigation. Myers 8 found that immediate recall in the form of written reproduction was beneficial to later reproduction of a list of unrelated words. An indirect or incidental method of learning the words had been employed. * This article reports, in part, an investigation conducted by the writer as a
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Further, taking the initial test relatively earlybefore too much forgetting set in-helped performance more than a delayed initial test.”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Spitzer 1939
In the citing paper
“This pattern of results (since then demonstrated with other participant groups and other materials) has led researchers to suggest that taking a test can at least partially immunize a learner against forgetting.”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Spitzer 1939
In the citing paper
“Assessment tests are typically given weeks to months after learning events, when the effects of tests to promote memory are minimised.11”
From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
The influence on learning and retention of weekly as opposed to monthly tests.
Keys, N. (1934) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0074468 · Cited by 48
The Relation of Reading Comprehension and Retention to Hearing Comprehension and Retention
Young, W. E. (1936) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.1936.11010028 · Cited by 30
Factual memory of secondary school pupils for a short article which they read a single time.
Dietze, A. G., & Jones, G. E. (1931) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0070339 · Cited by 20
Recall in relation to retention.
Myers, G. C. (1914) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0075769 · Cited by 20
Correlations of immediate and delayed recall.
Gates, A. I. (1918) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0074445 · Cited by 10
Yoakam, G. A. (1922) · Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa) · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x · Cited by 2,867
The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037
Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 · Cited by 1,888
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 · Cited by 1,796
Metadata
- Authors
- Spitzer, H. F.
- Corresponding author
- Spitzer, H. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1939-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 641-656
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2001308469
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational methodologies and cognitive development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- retention, memory retrieval, forgetting, retention curve, item difficulty, learning ability, reading acquisition, children, memory, research methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review