CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 307Memory Processes and InfluencesEducational methodologies and cognitive developmentVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Studies in retention.

Spitzer, H. F.·1939·Journal of Educational Psychology
DOI 10.1037/h0063404
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present investigation was planned with special reference to (1) the effect of recall on retention, (2) the relationship between the rate of forgetting and the ability of the subjects, and (3) the effect of item difficulty on the form of retention curves. PROBLEM The importance of retention is shown by the fact that growth or improvement in skills, knowledges, and attitudes is dependent upon the learner's retention of the effects of previous experience. The use of recall as an aid to retention has been emphasized by theorists on methods of study and by investigators in the field of memory. The lack of experimental evidence on the effect of recall on retention where conditions approach those of actual schoolroom practice prompted this investigation. The primary purpose of the investigation was to determine the effect of recall on retention of facts which children acquire through reading when the materials and the methods of study are similar to those used in classroom situations. Two subsidiary problems of the investigation relate to the effect of item difficulty upon the form of retention curves and to the relationship between the learning ability of the students and the rate of forgetting. Related Research.—A number of experimental studies have dealt with various aspects of the problem of this investigation. Myers 8 found that immediate recall in the form of written reproduction was beneficial to later reproduction of a list of unrelated words. An indirect or incidental method of learning the words had been employed. * This article reports, in part, an investigation conducted by the writer as a

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0063404

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Spitzer, H. F.
Corresponding author
Spitzer, H. F.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1939-12
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
641-656
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
DOI
10.1037/h0063404
OpenAlex
W2001308469
Cited by
306
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational methodologies and cognitive development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
retention, memory retrieval, forgetting, retention curve, item difficulty, learning ability, reading acquisition, children, memory, research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review