The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Graphic Rating Scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Graphic representation of pain
Scott, J., & Huskisson, E. C. (1976) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(76)90113-5 · Cited by 2,706
A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena
Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K. (1990) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.4770130405 · Cited by 2,580
Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review
McCormack, H. M., de L. Horne, D. J., & Sheather, S. (1988) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700009934 · Cited by 2,108
Aitken, R. C. B. (1969) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/003591576906201005 · Cited by 1,539
Stubbs, R. J., Hughes, D. A., Johnstone, A. M., Rowley, E., Reid, C., Elia, M., Stratton, R., Delargy, H., King, N., & Blundell, J. E. (2000) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114500001719 · Cited by 674
Metadata
- Authors
- Freyd, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1923-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-102
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W1998788003
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Graphic Rating Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0074329
- The paper
- Freyd, M. (1923). The Graphic Rating Scale. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
