Cited by 2,580Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationPain Management and Opioid Use

A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena

Wewers, Mary Ellen, Lowe, Nancy K.·1990·Research in Nursing & Health

Abstract

Visual analogue scales (VAS) have been used in the social and behavioral sciences to measure a variety of subjective phenomena. The VAS method has potential utility for the measurement of a variety of clinical phenomena of interest to nurse investigators. In this review a description of the various forms of the VAS and an historical overview of their development are presented. In addition, conceptual, psychometric, and statistical aspects of the VAS are considered. Finally, strengths and limitations of the VAS method are addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nur.4770130405

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wewers, Mary Ellen
Venue
Research in Nursing & Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-08
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
227-236
ISSN
  • 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-240X
OpenAlex
W2120263268
Cited by
2,580
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 154 · 2015: 143 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 139 · 2012: 128
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Nursing & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
visual analogue scale, subjective indicators, clinical phenomena, psychometrics, measurement validity, measurement reliability, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Humans, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Nursing Research, Clinical Nursing Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review