The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus.
Abstract
Three experiments investigating second-order conditioning were conducted with rat subjects. An appetitive Pavlovian conditioning situation was employed in which the response measure was the amount of general activity. Experiment 1 provided a well-controlled demonstration of substantial second-order conditioning. In Experiment 2 extinction of the first-order conditioned stimulus (CS) has no effect upon the response to the second-order CS. Experiment 3 examined the relationship of the second-order conditioning paradigm to that of conditioned inhibition. Both phenomena could be observed simultaneously in the same setting. Implications for second-order conditioning and related conditioning phenomena are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inhibition of avoidance behavior.
Rescorla, R. A., & Lolordo, V. M. (1965) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0022060 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Cited by
Rethinking the Emotional Brain
LeDoux, J. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.004 · Cited by 1,594
“Thus, a rat can recognize a predator (cat, fox) by specific chemical constituents of predator odors (Wallace and Rosen, 2000; Vyas et al., 2007; Dielenberg et al., 2001; Markham et al., 2004; Blanchard et al., 2003) and does not have to recognize the predator as a complex perceptual pattern.”
Hatfield, T., Han, J.-S., Conley, M., Gallagher, M., & Holland, P. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05256.1996 · Cited by 555
Self-citationUnlimited Associative Learning and the origins of consciousness: a primer and some predictions
Birch, J., Ginsburg, S., & Jablonka, E. (2020) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-020-09772-0 · Cited by 149
Neural systems underlying aversive conditioning in humans with primary and secondary reinforcers
Delgado, M. R., Jou, R. L., & Phelps, E. A. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00071 · Cited by 141
Setlow, B., Holland, P. C., & Gallagher, M. (2002) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.116.2.267 · Cited by 160
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Holland, P. C., & Rescorla, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology
- Published
- 1975
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 459-467
- ISSN
- 0021-9940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091920001
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0076219
- The paper
- Holland, P. C., & Rescorla, R. A. (1975). Second-order conditioning with food unconditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
