Cited by 1,594Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Rethinking the Emotional Brain

Open access
LeDoux, Joseph·2012·Neuron

Abstract

I propose a reconceptualization of key phenomena important in the study of emotion-those phenomena that reflect functions and circuits related to survival, and that are shared by humans and other animals. The approach shifts the focus from questions about whether emotions that humans consciously feel are also present in other animals, and toward questions about the extent to which circuits and corresponding functions that are present in other animals (survival circuits and functions) are also present in humans. Survival circuit functions are not causally related to emotional feelings but obviously contribute to these, at least indirectly. The survival circuit concept integrates ideas about emotion, motivation, reinforcement, and arousal in the effort to understand how organisms survive and thrive by detecting and responding to challenges and opportunities in daily life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.004

Cites

400 of 400 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assuming that an action is equivalent to an emotion, which I call the mental inference fallacy, has wreaked havoc with the scientific accumulation of knowledge about emotion.

    “This error, assuming that an action is equivalent to an emotion, which I call the mental inference fallacy (Barrett, 2017), has wreaked havoc with the scientific accumulation of knowledge about emotion (also see Barrett, 2012; LeDoux, 2012).”

    From The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization (2016) · cites this paper as LeDoux, 2012

    The Introduction (page not provided) warns that treating behavioral responses as inherently emotional gives them “confusing implications,” and the section “Survival Circuits and Human Feelings” cautions against inferring feelings from an animal’s actions. This supports the criticism of equating action with emotion, but LeDoux does not establish the stronger claim that the error has “wreaked havoc” with the accumulation of scientific knowledge. The citing sentence attributes the name of the fallacy to Barrett, not LeDoux. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Defensive survival circuits are evolutionarily wired to detect and respond to innate threats and to respond to novel threats that have been learned about in the past.

    “Defensive survival circuits are evolutionarily wired to detect and respond to innate threats and to respond to novel threats that have been learned about in the past (35,36).”

    From A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness (2017) · cites this paper as [36]

  • Approximately 153 billion GB of data were generated in 2013, with projected growth of 48% per year.

    “Approximately 153 billion GB of data were generated in 2013, with projected growth of 48% per year.67”

    From Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making. (2020) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Introduction discusses growth in publications about emotion, while Global Organismic States discusses methods for measuring brain activity; neither addresses data generated in 2013. Searches for “153 billion GB” and “48% per year” found no passage supporting either figure in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The fear circuit is involved in evaluation and detection of threat cues, eliciting and regulating emotional responses, and fear learning and extinction.

    “This fear circuit is involved in evaluation and detection of threat cues, eliciting and regulating emotional responses, and fear learning and extinction (LeDoux, 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 409 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Averill J 1980 Emotion and anxiety: Sociocultural, biological, and psychological determinants Explaining emotions Rorty AO Berkeley University of California Press
  2. Ekman P 1980 Biological and cultural contributions to body and facial movement in the expression of emotions Explaining Emotions Rorty AO Berkeley University of California Press
  3. Flynn JP 1967 The neural basis of aggression in cats Biology and Behavior: Neurophysiology and Emotion Glass DG 40 60 New York Rockefeller University Press and Russell Sage Foundation
  4. Frijda N 1986 The Emotions Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  5. LeDoux JE 1995 Seting “Stress” into Motion Neurobiological and Clinical Consequences of Stress: from Normal Adaptation to PTSD Friedman MJ Charney DS Deutch AY 125 134 New York Raven Press
  6. Lyons W 1980 Emotion Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  7. Panksepp J 1998 Affective Neuroscience New York Oxford U. Press
  8. Panksepp J 2000 Emotions as natural kinds within the mammalian brain Handbook of Emotions 2 Lewis M Haviland-Jones JM 137 156 New York The Guilford Press
  9. Rolls ET 2005 Emotion Explained New York Oxford University Press
  10. Rorty AO 1980 Explaining emotions Explaining emotions Rorty AO Berkeley University of California Press
  11. Schneirla TC 1959 An evolutionary theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Jones MR 1 42 University of Nebraska Press
  12. Shepherd G 1988 Neurobiology 2 New York Oxford
  13. Sutton RS Barto AG 1987 A temporal-difference model of classical conditioning Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 355 378
  14. Tomkins SS 1962 Affect, Imagery, Consciousness New York Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeDoux, J.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
LeDoux, Joseph
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
653-676
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108845151
Cited by
1,594
References
409
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 127 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 30
FWCI
49.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2012-03-08)
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH038774, R01MH046516)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA029053)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
emotions, emotional brain, motivation, reinforcement, arousal, animal emotions, neural circuits, survival function
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Humans, Motivation, Neural Pathways, Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review