CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 348Psychology of Social InfluenceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attribution versus persuasion as a means for modifying behavior.

Miller, Richard L., Brickman, Philip, Bolen, Diana·1975·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/h0076539
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present research compared the relative effectiveness of an attribution strategy with a persuasion strategy in changing behavior. Study 1 attempted to teach fifth graders not to litter and to clean up after others. An attribution group was repeatedly told that they were neat and tidy people, a persuasion group was repeatedly told that they should be neat and tidy, and a control group received no treatment. Attribution proved considerably more effective in modifying behavior. Study 2 tried to discover whether similar effects would hold for a more central aspect of school performance, math achievement and self-esteem, and whether an attribution of ability would be as effective as an attribution of motivation. Repeatedly attributing to second graders either the ability or the motivation to do well in math proved more effective than comparable persuasion or no-treatment control groups, although a group receiving straight reinforcement for math problem-solving behavior also did well. It is suggested that persuasion often suffers because it involves a negative attribution (a person should be what he is not), while attribution generally gains because it disguises persuasive intent.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0076539

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 348

Related

Metadata

Authors
Miller, R. L., Brickman, P., & Bolen, D.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1975-03
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
430-441
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/h0076539
OpenAlex
W2063967140
Cited by
348
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
57.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
attribution theory, persuasion, behavior modification, self-perception, littering, mathematics achievement, self-esteem, ability attribution, reinforcement, children
MeSH terms
Achievement, Aptitude, Behavior Therapy, Child, Ethics, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Motivation, Persuasive Communication, Problem Solving, Reinforcement, Verbal, Self Concept, Social Perception, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review