The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cholinergic receptor blockade impairs spatial localization by use of distal cues in the rat.
Abstract
Spatial localization was studied in the Morris water maze. The task required rats to escape from cool water (made opaque by milk) by finding a submerged, invisible platform located at a fixed place within the room. The start point was varied randomly, and there was no local cues to indicate the position of the platform. After training, the platform was moved. Rats subjected to central cholinergic receptor blockade with atropine sulfate were compared with normal rats and rats receiving peripheral cholinergic blockade with atropine methylnitrate. The controls for the use of search strategies, as compared with spatial mapping, were a group of blind rats and a group of rats for which the platform was moved from trial to trial. Measures of escape latency, swim distance, initial heading error, posttrial rearing on the platform, and search strategy after platform displacement revealed that the control rats and the atropine methylnitrate rats used a spatial mapping strategy to locate the platform. The atropine sulfate treated rats adopted a search strategy like that of the blind rats and the rats for which the platform was randomly moved: Their escape latency and swimming distance decreased across trials, including reversal trials, but their initial heading errors remained unchanged. The results support the idea that central cholinergic systems are important for spatial mapping, which demands the use of distal visual cues, but not for spatial localization, which requires other search strategies and possibly the use of proximal tactile, kinesthetic, and visual cues. Consistent with this idea, certain features of the atropine sulfate treated rats' behavior also suggested a novel explantation for some aspects of atropine stereotypies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat
Morris, R. (1984) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4 · Cited by 7,180
Sutherland, R. J., Whishaw, I. Q., & Kolb, B. (1983) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(83)90188-2 · Cited by 592
Self-citationHasselmo, M. E., & McGaughy, J. (2004) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(03)45015-2 · Cited by 525
Myhrer, T. (2003) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(02)00268-0 · Cited by 472
Blokland, A., Honig, W., & Raaijmakers, W. G. M. (1992) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245886 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Sutherland, R. J., Whishaw, I. Q., & Regehr, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 563-573
- ISSN
- 0021-9940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002108194
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cholinergic receptor blockade impairs spatial localization by use of distal cues in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0077914
- The paper
- Sutherland, R. J., Whishaw, I. Q., & Regehr, J. C. (1982). Cholinergic receptor blockade impairs spatial localization by use of distal cues in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077914
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.