Cited by 85Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSpatial Cognition and Navigation

Effects of intra-hippocampal scopolamine injections in a repeated spatial acquisition task in the rat

Blokland, Arjan, Honig, Wiel, Raaijmakers, Wijnand G. M.·1992·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The involvement of hippocampal cholinergic synapses in spatial discrimination learning was evaluated by locally administering scopolamine into the hippocampus. Sixteen 16-month-old male Lewis rats received bilaterally implanted cannulae aimed at the dorsal part of the hippocampus. The rats were trained on a repeated acquisition test in the Morris water-escape task. In this procedure the invisible platform is randomly moved from day to day to one of four possible locations. Thus, the rat has to learn to localize the platform from day to day. On each day the rats received four pairs of trials. Scopolamine injections (35 micrograms in 1 microliter per hippocampus) were given to one group (n = 8) on days 5 and 7. On days 6 and 8 all rats received saline injections. Place learning was retarded in the scopolamine-treated rats during the first swims of pairs of trials. During second swims the scopolamine-treated rats showed a general performance deficit, indicating that first and second swims were differentially affected. The data support the hypothesis that cholinergic neurotransmission in the dorsal hippocampus is involved in spatial learning processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02245886

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Local infusions of scopolamine into the hippocampus impair encoding of spatial information.

    “Local infusions of scopolamine into the hippocampus impair encoding of spatial information (Blokland et al., 1992; Rogers and Kesner, 2003).”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Blokland et al., 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blokland, A., Honig, W., & Raaijmakers, W. G. M.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1992-11
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
373-376
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2048954790
Cited by
85
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
scopolamine, hippocampus, cholinergic neurotransmission, spatial learning, spatial discrimination learning, Morris water maze, place learning, cholinergic synapses
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Discrimination Learning, Hippocampus, Injections, Male, Rats, Inbred Lew, Scopolamine, Space Perception, Swimming, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review