The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pain: Past, present and future.
Abstract
Descartes' concept that pain is produced by a direct, straight-through transmission system from injured tissues in the body to a pain centre in the brain has dominated pain research and therapy until recently. The gate control theory of pain, published in 1965, proposes that a mechanism in the dorsal horns of the spinal cord acts like a gate which inhibits or facilitates transmission from the body to the brain on the basis of the diameters of the active peripheral fibers as well as the dynamic action of brain processes. As a result, psychological variables such as past experience, attention and other cognitive activities have been integrated into current research and therapy on pain processes. The gate control theory, however, is not able to explain several chronic pain problems, such as phantom limb pain, which require a greater understanding of brain mechanisms. A new theory of brain function, together with recent research that has derived from it, are described. They throw light on complex pain problems and have important implications for basic assumptions in psychology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825
Phantom limbs, the self and the brain: The D.O. Hebb memorial lecture
Melzack, R. (1989) · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/h0079793 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Cited by
Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain
Sullivan, M. J. L., Thorn, B., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Keefe, F., Martin, M., Bradley, L. A., & Lefebvre, J. C. (2001) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008 · Cited by 2,472
Pain demands attention: A cognitive–affective model of the interruptive function of pain.
Eccleston, C., & Crombez, G. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.356 · Cited by 1,718
Restless legs syndrome: Revisiting the dopamine hypothesis from the spinal cord perspective
Clemens, S., Rye, D., & Hochman, S. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000223316.53428.c9 · Cited by 465
Hindle, K., Whitcomb, T., Briggs, W., & Hong, J. (2012) · Journal of Human Kinetics · doi:10.2478/v10078-012-0011-y · Cited by 347
Crawford, H. J., Knebel, T., Kaplan, L., Vendemia, J. M. C., Xie, M., Jamison, S., & Pribram, K. H. (1998) · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00207149808409992 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Melzack, R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 615-629
- ISSN
- 1196-1961 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-7290
- OpenAlex
- W1996974095
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pain: Past, present and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0078871
- The paper
- Melzack, R. (1993). Pain: Past, present and future. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.