Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading.

Rayner, Keith, Balota, David A., Pollatsek, Alexander·1986·Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie

Abstract

Les mouvements oculaires de sujets ont ete enregistres pendant la lecture de phrases et on a fait intervenir un changement dans la presentation avant qu'ils fixent un mot-cible critique. Lorsque le mouvement oculaire du lecteur traversait un endroit-limite invisible, le stimulus presente au debut etait remplace par le mot cible. Si un pretraitement semantique automatique de mots en parafoveal survenait pendant la lecture, la presence d'un mot semantiquement relie devrait faciliter le traitement du mot-cible

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0080111

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie
Published
1986-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
473-483
ISSN
0008-4255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018685028
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0080111
The paper
Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.