Cited by 30Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Management and ResiliencePsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Dreams following hurricane andrew

David, Daniella, Mellman, Thomas A.·1997·Dreaming

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0094475

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Except in cases of PTSD, dreams do not repeat specific memories, and those that do are considered pathological.

    “Except in cases of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), dreams do not repeat specific memories, and those that do are considered pathological”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
David, D., & Mellman, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Venue
Dreaming
Published
1997-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
209-214
ISSN
  • 1053-0797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3351
OpenAlex
W2076082433
Cited by
30
References
13
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Dreaming (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
Hurricane Andrew, dreams, disasters, trauma, post-traumatic stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review