The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 20 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
From ideas to efficacy: The ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Given the critical role of behavior in preventing and treating chronic diseases, it is important to accelerate the development of behavioral treatments that can improve chronic disease prevention and outcomes. Findings from basic behavioral and social sciences research hold great promise for addressing behaviorally based clinical health problems, yet there is currently no established pathway for translating fundamental behavioral science discoveries into health-related treatments ready for Phase III efficacy testing. This article provides a systematic framework for developing behavioral treatments for preventing and treating chronic diseases. METHOD: The Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials (ORBIT) model for behavioral treatment development features a flexible and progressive process, prespecified clinically significant milestones for forward movement, and return to earlier stages for refinement and optimization. RESULTS: This article presents the background and rationale for the ORBIT model, a summary of key questions for each phase, a selection of study designs and methodologies well-suited to answering these questions, and prespecified milestones for forward or backward movement across phases. CONCLUSIONS: The ORBIT model provides a progressive, clinically relevant approach to increasing the number of evidence-based behavioral treatments available to prevent and treat chronic diseases. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Phase IIb data showing that a behavioral treatment produces a clinically significant signal on the behavioral risk factor in patients with the specified clinical problem, while the chosen control does not, supports moving to a Phase III efficacy trial.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is widely acknowledged that behavior plays a central role in the prevention and management of chronic disease.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mokdad, Marks, Stroup, & Gerberding, 2004
- Not checked yetcites Schroeder, 2007
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“While understanding the mechanisms through which an intervention produces its effects can be useful in developing better-targeted interventions, it is not critical to understand mechanisms of action in order to demonstrate an intervention’s effectiveness (Blumenthal, Babyak, Wei, O’Connor, Waugh, Eisenstein, Mark, Sherwood, et al., 2002).”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Blumenthal, Babyak, Wei, O’Connor, Waugh, Eisenstein, Mark, Sherwood, et al., 2002
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“a 5% weight loss as a biomedical target (Hamman, Wing, Edelstein, Lachin, Bray, Delahanty, Hoskin, Kriska, et al., 2006)”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hamman, Wing, Edelstein, Lachin, Bray, Delahanty, Hoskin, Kriska, et al., 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the trial produces positive results, evidence specifically supporting each link of the chain strengthens the assertion that the observed effects were due to hypothesized pathways.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interventions that encourage healthy lifestyle behaviors, grounded in fundamental behavioral research and developed incrementally over time, have proven highly effective in reducing weight, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and incidence of diabetes, among other clinically important outcomes (Appel, Clark, Yeh, Wang, Coughlin, Daumit, Miller, Dalcin et al., 2011; Appel, Champagne, Harsha, Cooper”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Appel, Clark, Yeh, Wang, Coughlin, Daumit, Miller, Dalcin et al., 2011
- Not checked yetcites Appel, Champagne, Harsha, Cooper, Obarzanek, Elmer, Stevens, Vollmer, et al., 2003
- Not checked yetcites Knowler, Barrett-Connor, Fowler, Hamman, Lachin, Walker, Nathan, Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, 2002
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evidence collected for each link of the chain in negative trials can help determine whether null findings were due to a failure of the hypothesis that change in the behavioral risk factor is causally related to change in the biomedical outcome or a failure of the treatment to affect its targets.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“a Phase Ia review of epidemiological studies and clinical trials provides empirical support for the clinical significance of a 30% reduction in diabetes over standard drug treatment (Hamman, Wing, Edelstein, Lachin, Bray, Delahanty, Hoskin, Kriska, et al., 2006)”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hamman, Wing, Edelstein, Lachin, Bray, Delahanty, Hoskin, Kriska, et al., 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without a consistent framework to support progression toward the behavioral efficacy trial, the ability of behavioral and social science researchers to provide the type of evidence that is meaningful to clinical gatekeepers and third-party payers is compromised.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Although a feasibility pilot study produces an unstable estimate of the effect size on the primary endpoint of the Phase III efficacy trial (Kraemer, Mintz, Noda & Tinklenberg, 2006), it should be considered along with accumulated effect sizes from similar past trials to determine the sample size needed for the efficacy trial.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kraemer, Mintz, Noda & Tinklenberg, 2006
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 17
- It may state two separate claims as one. 9
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without a progressive approach to treatment development that embraces a variety of designs and methods, there is a risk that promising treatments will be abandoned prematurely because they fail tests that are too stringent for an evolving understanding of their fundamental elements.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Past models have emphasized the value of a systematic, phased approach to behavioral treatment development, and the recent emergence of evidence-based behavioral medicine (Davidson, Goldstein, Kaplan, Kaufmann, Knatterud, Orleans, Spring, Trudeau, & Whitlock, 2002) provides clear standards for rigor.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Davidson, Goldstein, Kaplan, Kaufmann, Knatterud, Orleans, Spring, Trudeau, & Whitlock, 2002
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ORBIT model complements and extends these efforts in proposing a systematic, well-defined process by which the investigator can achieve these rigorous standards.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, moderators (also called a priori subgroups in clinical trial methodology) can be studied in Phase Ib with the goal of adapting treatments so they are maximally powerful across all patients at risk.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Creating a robust evidence base for the value of behavioral treatments in clinical care has enormous potential to expand choices for patients, improve quality of care, prevent or delay disease and disability, and, most urgently, lower health care costs not only for individual patients but for society as a whole.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crosstalk between clinicians in medical practice and applied behavioral scientists can increase the significance of the questions posed and identify targets that have meaning in clinical practice.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without the early discovery and innovation that is characteristic of basic science, the potential for behavioral treatments to be robust enough to produce clinically significant results is undercut.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“both dietary changes (e.g., a 5% reduction in percent fat) and increases in physical activity (e.g., 150 minutes/week of moderately vigorous physical activity) as behavioral targets (Hamman, Wing, Edelstein, Lachin, Bray, Delahanty, Hoskin, Kriska, et al., 2006)”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hamman, Wing, Edelstein, Lachin, Bray, Delahanty, Hoskin, Kriska, et al., 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the ORBIT model, physiological mechanisms by which the behavioral risk factor translates into biomedical risk (referred to as biologic plausibility in epidemiology) can be focused on in early Phase Ia studies to help justify the choice of a behavioral risk factor and its cutpoint for clinical significance.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such crosstalk can facilitate the evaluation of a behavioral treatment’s viability as an alternative or adjunctive treatment, its side effect profile and effects on quality of life, and its potential cost-effectiveness relative to existing treatments.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It suggests that use of a progressive, transdisciplinary framework to facilitate the translation of basic behavioral science findings to clinical application will strengthen behavioral treatments, encourage their testing in rigorous efficacy and effectiveness trials, promote success, and foster dissemination into clinical practice.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crosstalk between basic and applied behavioral and social scientists can foster innovative approaches to common problems, leading to novel methods for motivating patients to stick with early changes, sustaining change by mobilizing social networks, or maximizing executive function as a way to minimize impulsivity.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a strong rationale for such methods, but when used universally, particularly in the early phases of treatment development, their use can undercut creativity, impede discovery, and produce weak treatments.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Most behavioral treatments are currently tested using randomized designs with attention control groups, fixed protocols, and blinding to outcomes until follow-up is complete.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This contrasts with the biomedical arena which benefits from industry support for early translational research and has a well-defined process for developing a new drug or device, starting with basic science research and progressing to the FDA-required Phase III efficacy trial.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman, Furburg, & DeMets, 1998
- Not checked yetcites Lipsky & Sharp, 2001
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Research using fMRI has shown that biofeedback can directly alter neural activity in specific brain regions and these changes can affect chronic clinical pain (deCharms, Maeda, Glover, Ludlow, Pauly, Soneji, Gabrieli, & Mackey, 2005).”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites deCharms, Maeda, Glover, Ludlow, Pauly, Soneji, Gabrieli, & Mackey, 2005
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of the studies presented in this illustration could be conducted by a single investigator, by a single team of investigators, or by a group of investigators who are, at best, loosely connected.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without input from clinical practice, treatments that are judged to be successful because they achieve statistical significance may produce results that are too small to be clinically meaningful.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Clinical guidelines promote lifestyle change as the first step in treatment of insulin resistant patients (Handelsman, Mechanick, Blonde, Gruberger, Bloomgarden, Bray, Dagogo-Jack, Davidson, et al., 2011), but few validated lifestyle interventions are available.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Handelsman, Mechanick, Blonde, Gruberger, Bloomgarden, Bray, Dagogo-Jack, Davidson, et al., 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Coller (2008) has observed that one of the key skills necessary for a successful translational effort is the ability to articulate a health need or clinical question requiring a solution “with the precision of a basic science hypothesis.””
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > Previous Efforts to Define a Process for Behavioral Intervention Development
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coller (2008)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It begins with preclinical basic science studies in animal or in vitro models to understand the disease process. Phase I and II studies turn to humans and focus on small numbers of highly-selected subjects. Phase I “dose-finding” studies determine the maximally tolerated dose of a candidate drug, while Phase II studies determine the impact of this maximally tolerated dose on significant biologic”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > THE ORBIT MODEL FOR BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT > The Process of Drug Development
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Friedman, Furburg, & DeMets, 1998
- Not checked yetcites Lipsky & Sharp, 2001
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, if they are conceptualized as crucial steps in a program of research that is directed toward efficacy and effectiveness trials to answer pressing clinical problems, their value becomes more apparent.”
§ From Ideas to Efficacy: The ORBIT Model for Developing Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Diseases > SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Rests on an assumption: Small early phase studies run the risk of being judged not very important.
The paper relies on this without support.
Applying bench findings to the bedside (Translation I research) is rare in behavioral science.
“Translation I research in which “bench” findings are applied to the “bedside” is uncommon in the behavioral arena.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Knowledge about fundamental human processes is not being optimally used for pressing behavioral health problems.
“Advances in understanding fundamental human processes such as motivation, emotion, cognition, self-regulation, decision-making, stress, and social networks are not being optimally applied to pressing behavioral health problems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Promising behavioral treatments in development are often abandoned instead of refined when they fail early tests.
“Promising behavioral treatments “in the pipeline” are often abandoned, rather than refined, if they fail early tests.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some treatments that succeed in early studies are not advanced to Phase III efficacy trials, while others enter Phase III prematurely without sufficient early-phase development.
“In some cases, treatments that achieve success in early studies are not pushed toward rigorous testing in Phase III efficacy trials, while others are tested in Phase III trials prematurely, without undergoing adequate development and refinement in early-phase studies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Behavioral treatments for physical health outcomes lack governmental regulation and a widely accepted development process.
“Since the development of behavioral treatments that target physical health outcomes has not been regulated by any governmental agency, it has not been guided by any widely recognized and agreed-upon process.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No established pathway currently exists to translate basic behavioral science discoveries into treatments ready for Phase III efficacy testing.
“Findings from basic behavioral and social science research hold great promise for addressing behaviorally-based clinical health problems, yet there is currently no established pathway for translating fundamental behavioral science discoveries into health-related treatments ready for Phase III efficacy testing.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Research efficiency and quality are enhanced when a collaborative team of investigators integrates diverse studies into a chain of evidence justifying a Phase III trial.
“An essential assumption of the ORBIT model is that research efficiency and quality are enhanced when a collaborative team of investigators works to integrate diverse studies into a chain of evidence that justifies a Phase III trial.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Few validated lifestyle interventions are available for insulin resistant patients.
“Clinical guidelines promote lifestyle change as the first step in treatment of insulin resistant patients (Handelsman, Mechanick, Blonde, Gruberger, Bloomgarden, Bray, Dagogo-Jack, Davidson, et al., 2011), but few validated lifestyle interventions are available.”
The paper relies on this without support.
All elements needed to go from ideas to an efficacy trial currently exist, but the pathway for doing so is not well-defined.
“Currently, all of the elements needed to go from ideas to the efficacy trial exist, but the pathway for doing so is not well-defined.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most behavioral treatments are currently tested using randomized designs with attention control groups, fixed protocols, and blinding to outcomes until follow-up is complete.
“Currently, most behavioral treatments are tested in the same way using randomized designs with attention control groups, fixed protocols, and blinding to outcomes until follow-up is complete.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Demand is growing for primary and secondary prevention strategies that can reduce the burden of costly chronic diseases which primarily have behavioral causes.
“Currently, a window of opportunity exists in which demand is growing for primary and secondary prevention strategies that can reduce the burden of costly chronic diseases which primarily have behavioral causes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Small early phase studies run the risk of being judged not very important.
“Small, early phase studies run the risk of being judged to be not very important.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“As a result we opted to rooted our analysis in behavioural science terminology as other work has suggested that this approach can help facilitate relevant understanding and application within the field of behavioural science [63].”
From Barriers and facilitators to diet, physical activity and lifestyle behavior intervention adherence: a qualitative systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as [63]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“The ORBIT model was first introduced in 2015 and provides a progressive and iterative approach for developing and testing new interventions.”
From A nonrandomized pilot of a group, video-based telehealth intervention to reduce diabetes distress in parents of youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“A key difference of the ORBIT model versus other approaches is its focus on using small, fluid, and cost-effective formative studies to develop and refine interventions ahead of launching expensive efficacy trials [13].”
From A nonrandomized pilot of a group, video-based telehealth intervention to reduce diabetes distress in parents of youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The ORBIT model defines four phases of treatment development.”
From A nonrandomized pilot of a group, video-based telehealth intervention to reduce diabetes distress in parents of youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Per the ORBIT model, evidence of achieving these milestones indicate a treatment may be appropriate for Phase 2 proof of concept or randomized pilot testing. [13]”
From A nonrandomized pilot of a group, video-based telehealth intervention to reduce diabetes distress in parents of youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Some potential strengths of this study include our use of the ORBIT model for behavioral intervention development to standardize study methods and help refine the intervention [13]”
From A nonrandomized pilot of a group, video-based telehealth intervention to reduce diabetes distress in parents of youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Intervention Mapping citation adds an author absent from the reference
MinorThe in-text citation includes Fernandez, but the matching 2011 reference lists only Bartholomew, Parcel, Kok, and Gottlieb.
“Intervention Mapping (Bartholomew, Parcel, Kok, Gottlieb & Fernandez, 2011)”
“4. Bartholomew L Parcel G Kok G Gottlieb G 2011 Planning health promotion programs: Intervention mapping San Francisco Jossey-Bass”
Davidson citation has conflicting years
MinorThe text cites this Davidson work as published in 2002, while the corresponding reference lists 2003.
“Davidson, Goldstein, Kaplan, Kaufmann, Knatterud, Orleans, Spring, Trudeau, & Whitlock, 2002”
“14. Davidson KW Goldstein M Kaplan RM Kaufmann PG Knatterud GL Orleans CT Spring B Trudeau KJ Whitlock EP 2003 Evidence-based behavioral medicine: what is it and how do we achieve it?”
ORBIT initiative citation has conflicting years
MinorThe in-text citation dates the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research initiative to 2010, but its reference-list entry is dated 2011.
“Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, 2010”
“37. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research 2011 Available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-11-063.html”
Citations
Cites
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin
(2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012512 · Cited by 19,011
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 · Cited by 13,697
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655 · Cited by 10,995
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Actual causes of death in the United States
McGinnis, J. M. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510180077038 · Cited by 5,480
Actual Causes of Death in the United States, 2000
Mokdad, A. H. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.10.1238 · Cited by 5,211
2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults
Jensen, M. D., Ryan, D. H., Apovian, C. M., Ard, J. D., Comuzzie, A. G., Donato, K. A., Hu, F. B., Hubbard, V. S., Jakicic, J. M., Kushner, R. F., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004 · Cited by 4,058
Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings
Kazdin, A. E. (1982) · Cited by 2,852
Jensen, M. D., Ryan, D. H., Apovian, C. M., Ard, J. D., Comuzzie, A. G., Donato, K. A., Hu, F. B., Hubbard, V. S., Jakicic, J. M., Kushner, R. F., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee · Cited by 2,735
Planning health promotion programs an intervention mapping approach
Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. (2006) · Cited by 2,038
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Friedman LM Furberg CD DeMets DL 1998 Fundamentals of Clinical Trials 3 New York Springer-Verlag
- Wansink B 2010 Designing Interventions that Stick: Behavioral Event Monitoring Presented at NIH Workshop on “Translating Ideas into Interventions: The Process of Developing Behavorial Interventions December 6–7, 2010 Bethesda, MD Available at http://www.nihorbit.org/ORBIT%20Content/Workshops%20and%20Conferences.aspx?PageView=Shared
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,100 of 1,176
Human Laboratory Paradigms in Addictions Research
Morris, V. L., Arshad, F., Balodis, I. M., Reed, D. D., MacKillop, J. M., & Amlung, M. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632591.010
Schoor, R., Bruce, J. M., Staggs, V. S., Fox, A. T., Bruce, A. S., LYNCH, S. G., & Catley, D. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23796
Developing a Narrative Communication Intervention in the Context of HPV VaccinationPreprint
Fleszar‐Pavlović, S. E., & Cameron, L. D. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/jkgzu
Feasibility studies and pilot trials in behavioral intervention research
Freedland, K. E. (2026) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2026.2734871
Compton, W. M., & Blanco, C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632591.001
Introduction to Intervention Research
(2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119610113.ch1
Zink, J., & Berrigan, D. A. (2025) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.11.001
Dean, M., Jowers, B., Conley, C. C., Camacho, E., Espinel, W., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2025) · PEC Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100402 · Cited by 1
Tucker, C. M., Klein, K. G., Garcia, K. A., Harrison, E. M., Folsom, K., & Wippold, G. M. (2026) · Journal of Prevention and Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/26320770261471877
Luseno, W. K., Iritani, B. J., Gilbertson, A., Odongo, F. S., & Agot, I. (2026) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-026-05257-5
Nagao, H. S., Shimazu, T., & Odawara, M. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.113108
Srivastava, A. B., & Gold, M. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632591.033
Cai, G., Pinski, J., Michener, L. A., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1844481
McGoron, L., Towner, E., Martel, M. M., Trentacosta, C. J., Purkayestha, S., Friedrich, F. S., Traylor, P., & Ondersma, S. J. (2023) · Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1037/cpp0000498
Willis, K. D., Thumma, L., Fox, A. M., Reid, M. P., Rybarczyk, B. D., Mazzeo, S. E., Keeley, J. W., Rodin, G., & Loughan, A. R. (2026) · Palliative & Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951526103460
“Therefore, the purpose of this Phase 1a Define trial (Czajkowski et al. 2015) was to elucidate malignant glioma caregivers’ perceptions of the standard CALM protocol, the relevance of the 4 CALM domains for caregivers, and caregivers’ recommendations for tailoring the intervention (e.g., content,…”
InfluentialHassman, A., Xu, Y., Zhou, L., Wang, Y., & Bove, A. M. (2025) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2025.2601189
“This sample size was chosen in accordance with the ORBIT framework for early-phase behavioral treatment development (Czajkowski et al, 2015).”
Hill, I. F., Boyter, B. A., Black, A. M., Ditor, D. S., & Locke, S. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2572361
“This study was designed as a proof-of-concept trial, which aims to determine whether a fixed treatment protocol can produce clinically meaningful change under ideal conditions and justify further testing [43].”
InfluentialSussman, S. Y. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632591.042
Sangalli, L., Manning, E., Abdykarimova, A., et al. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09388-0
“Consistent with the ORBIT model’s emphasis on predefined, clinically meaningful benchmarks in early-phase studies [33], thresholds for sufficient knowledge and confidence were set a priori at ≥ 70% and ≥ 50%, respectively.”
InfluentialKringle, E. A., Jahnke, K., Badu, A., Walsh, J., Skidmore, E. R., Lakshminarayan, K., Gibbs, B. B., & Lewis, B. (2026) · Telemedicine Reports · doi:10.1177/26924366261447903 · Cited by 1
“46,47 A larger sample is required to estimate intervention effects.”
(2025) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7023075/v1
“Given the proof-of-concept nature of this study [29], no speci�c hypotheses were made, but we expected the intervention to be perceived as acceptable, appropriate, and feasible among participants.”
de Souza, C. B., Mangia, M. S. P., Almeida, C. C. B., Pereira, R. C., Silva, D. F. A., & Teixeira, L. G. (2025) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuaf302 · Cited by 1
Herrero, R., Martínez-Sanchis, M., Zamora, Á., Vara, M. D., Campos, D., García‐Campayo, J., & Baños, R. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/86679
“…CBIs for chronic illness populations, a waiting list (WL) control was chosen as the comparator to establish the initial efficacy of iABCT before conducting comparisons with active treatment alternatives, following recommended sequential evaluation frameworks for behavioral interventions [39].”
Stephenson-Hunter, C., Florian, K., Singh, C., Chambers, E. C., Telzak, A., & Gallo, L. C. (2026) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibag065
“The NIH ORBIT model [26, 28] provides a phased framework for the development and testing of behavioral interventions, progressing from intervention design (Phase I), to preliminary testing (Phase II), efficacy testing (Phase III), and effectiveness testing (Phase IV).”
Sperling, E. L., & Hulett, J. M. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09556-2
“Because of our Phase 1a approach, a power calculation was not performed [9].”
InfluentialOn, A., Seguin‐Fowler, R. A., Githinji, P., Szeszulski, J., Uribe, A. L. M., Benner, L., Rodriguez, J., & Rethorst, C. D. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076261455915
“42 In addition, the variety of content and tracking tools allowed participants to engage in their preferred way.”
Paltell, K. C., Duffecy, J. L., Maki, P. M., Zakeri, S. E., Vujanovic, A. A., & Berenz, E. C. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/53744
“…interpersonal trauma exposure and current probable PTSD. Consistent with established guidelines for developing and testing novel interventions [64], the focus of this pilot was to assess the following: (1) the initial feasibility and acceptability of the SunnysideFlex intervention and (2)…”
MethodWright, P. J., Corbett, C. F., & Wang, K. (2025) · Advances in Public Health · doi:10.1155/adph/3876104
“In addition, research evidence supports theory-informed exercise interventions to improve exercise motivation [26].”
Cushing, C. C., Leslie‐Miller, C. J., Koskela-Staples, N. C., Ortega, A., Shcherbinin, H., Prabhakaran, S., & Fedele, D. A. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/63905
“In response to these challenges, our team developed the Responsive Asthma Care for Teens (ReACT) system, a project using the model from the Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials (ORBIT) consortium for designing and evaluating behavioral interventions [18].”
Bitēna, D. K., Salmane-Kuļikovska, I., Duhovská, J., Znotiņa, I., Šļahota, D., Lejniece, S., & Mārtinsone, K. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9600015/v1
Bissonnette, J., Côté, A., Desameau, P., Cossette, M., Pinard, A.-M., Arbour, C., Fortin, G., Ogez, D., & Rainville, P. (2025) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103281
Brondolo, E. N. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815680-3.00001-3
Spiropoulos, A., Vincent, N., Tomfohr‐Madsen, L. M., Brost, A., Schmidtler, H., MacKinnon, A., & Kopala‐Sibley, D. C. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09542-5
“The control arm of the study is designed to account for the potential effects of psychoeducation, time, and regular care on change in insomnia symptoms [22].”
Pongpanit, K., Patel, G., Sellan, L., Nguyen, L., Jewett, M., Moullec, G., Gomes, S. M., Labonté, J., Kwan, C., Gagnon, S., et al. (2026) · Hypertension Research · doi:10.1038/s41440-026-02556-1
Lamore, K., & Ogez, D. (2022) · Psycho-Oncologie · doi:10.3166/pson-2022-0182
Moderators of a mHealth Intervention for Adolescent Physical Activity: Intervention Refinement Study
Cushing, C. C., Ortega, A., Fedele, D. A., Leslie‐Miller, C. J., Carlson, J., Davis, A. M., & Smyth, J. M. (2025) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/59334
“Framed within the ORBIT (Obesity Relation Behavioral Intervention Trials) model of intervention development [16], we [17] developed and evaluated the NUDGE (Network Underwritten Dynamic Goals Engine) as an unrandomized proof-of-concept study.”
Designing a Perioperative Mind-Body Intervention for Peripheral Vascular InterventionsPreprint
Png, C. Y. M., Mehta, D. H., Dua, A., Stephen, A. E., Bruce, A. M., Forsythe, A., Chitilian, H. V., Bringle, E. J., Simpson, J. C., Parady, K. M., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.06.07.24308071
Bissonnette, J., Guertin, M., Pinard, A.-M., Ogez, D., & Rainville, P. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4831418
James, D., & Schmitt, H. J. (2026) · Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.70185
“We note that other translation and implementation models are certainly used by health psychologists (e.g., PRECEDE – PROCEED model, ORBIT model, Czajkowski & Hunter, 2021; Czajkowski et al., 2015), which vary in the extent to which they center community engagement.”
Braun, A. C., Corcoran, S., Hosseininasab, D., Johnson, M., Kochackpour, F., Hébert, E. T., Teague, T. K., Jelley, M., Frank-Pearce, S. G., Liebe, R. A., et al. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/97873
“On the basis of our primary study outcome (feasibility), we will conduct a 2-phase single-arm study [42,43] to preliminarily test our mHealth-based fiber intervention in up to 80 young adults with prediabetes (phase 1) and elucidate factors that impact sustained behavior change and fiber intake…”
Chevestrier-Lefeuvre, A., Guiné, J., Véronneau, J., Lebeau, J., Rousseaux, F., Laurin, A., Simard, M.-F., Godin, N., Jerbi, K., Richebé, P., et al. (2026) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-026-01432-0
Video Teleheath and Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Need for a Better Understanding
Gagnon, S., Ross, B., & Bourbeau, J. (2019) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201907-1394le
Bove, A. M., Zavacky, E. N., Zeleznik, H., Bise, C. G., Patterson, C. G., Parmanto, B., & Fitzgerald, G. K. (2025) · JOSPT open. · doi:10.2519/josptopen.2025.0167
Satish, A., Baga, K., Lapitan, E., Lassiter, J. M., Lobo, A. F., & Arigo, D. (2025) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2025.2594481
“Assessing the desirability of potential partners, and of a partner-based approach to PA promotion overall, was selected as a straightforward way to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a future intervention among those likely to participate (i.e. those who have some interest in increasing PA; Czajkowski et al.,…”
InfluentialLean on me: attachment and mental health in couples facing cardiovascular disease
Sztajerowski, K., Greenman, P., Bouchard, K., & Tulloch, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1657068
Higgins, M. G., Helmkamp, L. J., Zimmaro, L. A., Leslie, S. E., Adams, M., Vemuru, S. R., Huynh, V. D., Baurle, E., Bozzuto, L., Rojas, K. E., et al. (2026) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-026-10381-y
“Given the proof-of-concept nature of this study [30], no specific hypotheses were made, but we expected the intervention to be perceived as acceptable, appropriate, and feasible among participants.”
Maukel, L., Coutinho, T. A., Mulvagh, S. L., Madan, M., Pacheco, C., Bouchard, K., So, D. Y. F., Reed, J., Liu, S., Sun, L. Y., et al. (2026) · JACC Advances · doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102792
Madva, E. N., Huffman, J. C., Murray, H. B., McGranaghan, E., Bidgood, M., Gan, J. Y., Wasserman, B., Feig, E. H., Healy, B. C., Staller, K. D., et al. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/98352
“…clinical trials [47], the ORBIT (Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials) model of behavioral treatment development for chronic diseases [48], and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) stage model for behavioral intervention development [49], and building on prior qualitative research…”
Influential(2026) · doi:10.1111/jir.70155
“The project is structured according to the stages of the ORBIT model for behavioural interventions (Czajkowski et al. 2015).”
Tobin, S. Y., Smith, J. K., DeSalvo, K., Beacham, A. O., Chamberlain, E., Cornier, M., & Halliday, T. M. (2024) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.48.6.18
Ferguson, R. J., Terhorst, L. A., Gibbons, B., Posluszny, D. M., Chang, H. T., Bovbjerg, D. H., & McDonald, B. C. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15184643
“…inform and improve treatment and thus keep up with rapid technological advances of newly developed cancer therapies that may induce CRCI [22,25,26,47,48]; (4) SCEDs can provide important clinical information about outcomes that can contribute to the knowledge base of clinical science,…”
BackgroundMethodKlinedinst, T. C., Pope, Z., Robertson, M. C., Stanley, N., Wint, A., Henson, C. E., & Kendzor, D. E. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/73554
“To that end, we are conducting an Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials Phase II trial [22] to investigate the acceptability and feasibility of a novel 8-week OT program among 38 urban and rural breast cancer survivors that features (1) 8 once-weekly telehealth OT sessions, and (2)…”
Seo, Y., Hudmon, K. S., Weddle, K. J., Yih, Y., Miller, K. D., & Abebe, E. (2026) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s553015
“…upon our prior work where we identified the need for OAMs management support, 23 we applied a PD approach to support rapid cycle design iteration and early stage prototype development consistent with ORBIT Phase 1a (Design) 24 and aligned with established co-design methodology in health research.”
American Legal Issues in Addiction Treatment and Research
Willick, D. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632591.041
Seferian, E. G., Berdahl, C. T., Coleman, B. L., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.03.25328744
Harper, K. L., Kelton, K., Livingston, N. A., Iverson, K. M., Sloan, C. A., Batchelder, A., & Marx, B. P. (2026) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2026.101650
“Additionally, trials with a longer follow-up time period will be needed to determine whether any treatment gains are maintained over time [73].”
NICU Music Therapy: Lessons Learned from a Randomized Trial
Germano, E., Grossoehme, D. H., Richner, G. J., Jenkins, R., Teal, C. M., Brown, M. F., Delahanty, D. L., & Friebert, S. E. (2024) · Music Therapy Perspectives · doi:10.1093/mtp/miae019
Mello, C., Rivard, M., & Lefebvre, C. (2026) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102824
Ongoing and Future Research Directions
(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632591.030
Ishimoto, Y., Nogami, K., & Yamane, T. (2026) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-026-10066-8
Masonbrink, A. R., Wooten, S., Yeh, H., Stancil, S. L., Miller, M. K., Wilson, K. M., Simon, T. D., Leventhal, A. M., & Catley, D. (2026) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc-2025-060006
The “Listen In” Approach: A Novel Early-Phase Method to Inform Intervention Adaptation
Gupta-Louis, S. K., Wang, Z., Zoeter, D. E., Shahrokni, R. A., & Hoyt, M. A. (2025) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-025-10413-7
Deckelbaum, L., Guarascio, N., Bastien, M.-P., Cloutier, A., Kondyli, M., Latour, M.-P., Rondeau, É., & Sultan, S. (2025) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol32110632
“Demonstrating social validity, as we did here with BWW, is a crucial first step in evaluating a new intervention [54].”
Oselinsky, K. M., Hill, E. B., Ostendorf, D. M., Pan, Z., Bing, K., Wayland, L. T., Simpson, C., Clark, K. C., Sandoval, A. C., Thomas, E. A., et al. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/86281
“Additional clinical outcomes relevant to the proposed protocol will also be examined (Table 2) [26].”
InfluentialMacKinnon, A., Madsen, J., Dhillon, A. K., Keys, E., Giesbrecht, G. F., Williamson, T. S., Metcalfe, A., Campbell, T. S., Mrklas, K., & Tomfohr‐Madsen, L. M. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xdzrv
Cardinal, É., Greban, L., Delage, J., Godin, N., Fournier, V., Brunel, J., Landry, M., Rainville, P., & Ogez, D. (2026) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci16101007
“…version of the model, consisting of a proof of concept (IIa) evaluating the program’s capacity to produce clinically significant changes, a pilot and feasibility study (IIb) evaluating feasibility and preliminary effects in a small sample, and a phase II efficacy study (IIc) (see Figure 1) [32,33].”
Anhedonia in Addictive Behaviors
Dyer, W. G., Leventhal, A. M., Goldenson, N. I., & Bello, M. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632591.039
Nieto, C., Milton, M., Kadan‐Lottick, N. S., Ross, W. L., Santiago‐Rivera, Y., Armstrong, H., Ceballos, R., Chow, E. J., Ness, K. K., Casillas, J., et al. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.103286
Kleckner, A. S., Clingan, C. L., James, S., Addison, O. R., Hussain, A., Kleckner, I. R., Mohile, S. G., Ryan, A. S., Schotz, K. M., Terrin, M. L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2026.103077
Patton, M., Carlson, L. E., Noel, M. E., Palermo, T. M., Forster, V. J., Cho, S., & Schulte, F. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/45804
Metadata
- Authors
- Czajkowski, S. M., Powell, L. H., Adler, N., Naar-King, S., Reynolds, K. D., Hunter, C. M., Laraia, B., Olster, D. H., Perna, F. M., Peterson, J. C., Epel, E., Boyington, J. E., & Charlson, M. E.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Claremont Graduate University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Health Psychology
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 971-982
- ISSN
- 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7810
- PMC
- PMC4522392
- OpenAlex
- W1985326609
- Cited by
- 1,161
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 118 · 2025: 152 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 50.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Scholarship @ Claremont (The Claremont Colleges) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging
- American Federation for Aging Research
- John A. Hartford Foundation
- Atlantic Philanthropies (K23AG042869)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- ORBIT model, chronic disease prevention, chronic disease treatment
- MeSH terms
- Behavior Therapy, Chronic Disease, Humans, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
