Cited by 671Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Microrandomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions.

Open access
Klasnja, Predrag, Hekler, Eric B., Shiffman, Saul, Boruvka, Audrey, Almirall, Daniel, Tewari, Ambuj, Murphy, Susan A.·2015·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article presents an experimental design, the microrandomized trial, developed to support optimization of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs). JITAIs are mHealth technologies that aim to deliver the right intervention components at the right times and locations to optimally support individuals' health behaviors. Microrandomized trials offer a way to optimize such interventions by enabling modeling of causal effects and time-varying effect moderation for individual intervention components within a JITAI. METHOD: The article describes the microrandomized trial design, enumerates research questions that this experimental design can help answer, and provides an overview of the data analyses that can be used to assess the causal effects of studied intervention components and investigate time-varying moderation of those effects. RESULTS: Microrandomized trials enable causal modeling of proximal effects of the randomized intervention components and assessment of time-varying moderation of those effects. CONCLUSION: Microrandomized trials can help researchers understand whether their interventions are having intended effects, when and for whom they are effective, and what factors moderate the interventions' effects, enabling creation of more effective JITAIs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000305

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Owing to repeated randomization, a microrandomized trial allows for the evaluation of the moderating role of contextual factors, such as current mood and time, on the proximal effects of the intervention.

    “owing to repeated randomization, an MRT allows for the evaluation of the moderating role of contextual factors, such as current mood and time, on the proximal effects of the intervention [22].”
  • The micro-randomized trial is a sequential factorial design for modeling effectiveness of treatment components over time.

    “The micro-randomized trial is a sequential factorial design for modeling effectiveness of treatment components over time.”
  • The micro-randomized trial can be used to test proximal main effects of components over time, time-varying moderation, and, with variations in study design based on system identification, the development of idiographic computational models.

    “It can be used to test proximal main effects of components over time, time-varying moderation [16], and with variations in study design based on strategies from system identification, the development of idiographic computational models [17, 18].”
  • Micro-randomized trials provide a resource-efficient way to evaluate the agile science product types as data will be available about the interrelationship between modules, individuals, and context over time.

    “Particularly when methods such as micro-randomized trials are used, they provide a resource-efficient way to evaluate the agile science product types as data will be available about the interrelationship between modules, individuals, and context over time [16].”
  • A sister project headed by coauthor Klasnja is focused on developing modules that support physical activity maintenance.

    “A sister project headed by coauthor Klasnja, is focused on developing modules that support physical activity maintenance [16].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 671

Authors
Klasnja, P., Hekler, E. B., Shiffman, S., Boruvka, A., Almirall, D., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2015-12
Volume
34
Issue
Suppl
Pages
1220-1228
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2474213459
Cited by
671
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1
FWCI
27.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01HL12544001, U54EB020404, P50-DA-010075, R03-MH-097954)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
just-in-time adaptive interventions, mobile health, intervention optimization, causal effects, health behavior change
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Research Design, Health Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Telemedicine, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review