Cited by 485Behavioral Health and InterventionsHealth and Wellbeing ResearchMedia Influence and Health

A meta-analysis of the health action process approach.

Open access
Zhang, Chun-Qing, Zhang, Ru, Schwarzer, Ralf, Hagger, Martin S.·2019·Health Psychology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The health action process approach (HAPA) is a social-cognitive model specifying motivational and volitional determinants of health behavior. A meta-analysis of studies applying the HAPA in health behavior contexts was conducted to estimate the size and variability of correlations among model constructs, test model predictions, and test effects of past behavior and moderators (behavior type, sample type, measurement lag, study quality) on model relations. METHOD: A literature search identified 95 studies meeting inclusion criteria with 108 independent samples. Averaged corrected correlations among HAPA constructs and multivariate tests of model predictions were computed using conventional meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation modeling, with separate models estimated in each moderator group. RESULTS: Action and maintenance self-efficacy and outcome expectancies had small-to-medium sized effects on health behavior, with effects of outcome expectancies and action self-efficacy mediated by intentions, and action and coping planning. Effects of risk perceptions and recovery self-efficacy were small by comparison. Past behavior attenuated the intention-behavior relationship. Few variations in model effects were observed across moderator groups. Effects of action self-efficacy on intentions and behavior were larger in studies on physical activity compared with studies on dietary behaviors, whereas effects of volitional self-efficacy on behavior were larger in studies on dietary behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the importance of self-efficacy in predicting health behavior in motivational and volitional action phases. The analysis is expected to catalyze future research including experimental studies targeting change in individual HAPA constructs, and longitudinal research to examine change and reciprocal effects among constructs in the model. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000728

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (1998). 'Inclined abstainers': A problem for predicting health related behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37 , 151-165. doi: 10.1111/j.20448309.1998.tb01162.x · DOI
  2. Payaprom, Y., Bennett, P., Alabaster, E., & Tantipong, H. (2011). Using the health action process approach and implementation intentions to increase flu vaccine uptake in high risk Thai individuals: A controlled before-after trial. Health Psychology, 30 , 492-500. doi: 10.1037/a0023580 · DOI
  3. Rothman, A. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., Grant, A. M., Neal, D. T., Sheeran, P., & Wood, W. (2015). Hale and hearty policies: How psychological science can create and maintain healthy habits. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10 , 701-705. doi: 10.1177/1745691615598515 · DOI
  4. Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55 , 182-186. doi: 10.1198/000313001317097960 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behaviour change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57 , 1-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Schwarzer, R., & Luszczynska, A. (2015). Health action process approach. In M. T. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed., pp. 252-278). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  7. Schwarzer, R., Schüz, B., Ziegelmann, J. P., Lippke, S., Luszczynska, A., & Scholz, U. (2007). Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33 , 156-166. doi: 10.1007/BF02879897 · DOI
  8. Teng, Y., & Mak, W. W. S. (2011). The role of planning and self-efficacy in condom use among men who have sex with men: An application of the health action process approach model. Health Psychology, 30 , 119-128. doi: 10.1037/a0022023 · DOI
  9. van Bree, R. J. H., van Stralen, M. M., Mudde, A. N., Bolman, C., de Vries, H., & Lechner, L. (2015). Habit as mediator of the relationship between prior and later physical activity: A longitudinal study in older adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 19 , 95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.03.006 · DOI
  10. Yeager, M. C., Shoji, K., Luszczynska, A., & Benight, C. C. (2018). Engagement with a trauma recovery internet intervention explained with the health action process approach (HAPA): Longitudinal study. JMIR Mental Health, 5 , e29. doi: 10.2196/mental.9449 · DOI
  11. Zhou, G., Gan, Y., Miao, M., Hamilton, K., Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2015). The role of action control and action planning on fruit and vegetable consumption. Appetite, 91 , 64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.022 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, C.-Q., Zhang, R., Schwarzer, R., & Hagger, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hagger, Martin S.
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2019-07
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
623-637
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2937214523
Cited by
485
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (FRG1/15-16/041)
  • Business Finland (1801/31/2015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
Health Action Process Approach, health behavior, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, intention, coping planning, risk perception, recovery self-efficacy, physical activity, dietary behavior, social cognitive model
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Motivation, Volition, Health Behavior, Exercise, Self Efficacy, Intention, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review