Cited by 72Physical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Development and exploratory cluster-randomised opportunistic trial of a theory-based intervention to enhance physical activity among adolescents

Open access
Araújo-Soares, Vera, McIntyre, Teresa, MacLennan, Graeme, Sniehotta, Falko F.·2009·Psychology & Health

Abstract

This article reports the development and exploratory testing of a school-based intervention programme designed to enhance levels of physical activity in adolescents. The intervention is based on social cognitive theory (SCT), self-regulation theory (SRT) and planning as evidence-based mediators of physical activity changes. Two classes, paired on socio-economic variables, were selected from each of eight Portuguese schools and randomly assigned to an intervention or control group (N = 291). Primary outcome was 'moderate to vigorous physical activity' (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) measured pre and post intervention and at three and nine months follow-up. SCT, SRT and planning variables were secondary outcomes measured pre and post intervention. At post test, participants in the intervention group reported 18 min per week more physical activity (PA), adjusted for pre-intervention, age and sex, than those in the control group (95% confidence interval -10 to 46; p = 0.249). This difference increased to 33 min (95% CI-4 to 71; p = 0.082) at three months and to 57 min (95% CI 13 to 101, p = 0.008) at nine month follow-up. Moreover, the intervention resulted in changes of some of the theoretical target variables, including outcome expectancies and coping planning. However, no evidence was found for the changes in theoretical moderators to mediate the intervention effects on behaviour. Implications for theory and for future research are discussed.

Verified 2026-10-06 · 1 reference not checked yet

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This exploratory cluster-randomised school trial tested a theory-based physical activity module for Portuguese adolescents and found no significant post-test group difference, but a growing difference that became significant at nine months. The programme changed some targeted cognitions, especially situation outcome expectancies and coping planning, yet mediation of behaviour change was not supported.

Key findings

  • At post-test, intervention participants reported 18 minutes/week more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity than controls after adjustment for baseline activity, age, and sex (95% CI −10 to 46; p = .249). The difference rose to 33 minutes/week at 3 months (95% CI −4 to 71; p = .082) and 57 minutes/week at 9 months (95% CI 13 to 101; p = .008 in the abstract; the results table reports p = .011).
  • A conservative baseline-imputed sensitivity analysis showed a 9-month difference of 45 minutes/week (95% CI 9 to 82; p = .016) and a 3-month difference of 26 minutes/week (95% CI −5 to 57; p = .098).
  • The intervention significantly increased situation outcome expectancies (effect 0.235, 95% CI 0.024 to 0.447, p = .029) and coping planning (effect 0.320, 95% CI 0.077 to 0.562, p = .010). Self-efficacy and action planning trends favoured intervention but were not significant; small non-significant trends favoured controls for action outcome expectancies and goal intentions.
  • No evidence supported mediation of intervention effects on behaviour through the theoretical variables. Baseline physical activity and sex predicted later physical activity, while age did not; models explained 24.9%, 29.8%, and 36.9% of variance at post-test, 3 months, and 9 months, respectively.

Methods

  • Opportunistic cluster-randomised trial in eight schools in northern Portugal. Two classes per school matched on socio-demographic variables were randomly assigned to intervention or control after baseline; 291 adolescents participated (mean age 12.13 years, SD 1.01; 47.4% male; 57.4% rural; 10 sixth-grade and 6 seventh-grade classes).
  • The physical activity module consisted of two 90-minute classroom sessions plus homework and self-monitoring diaries, delivered by a trained psychologist with a physical education teacher; controls received usual education. The primary outcome was self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity measured with the IPAQ seven-day recall at pre-test, post-test, 3 months, and 9 months; social-cognitive and planning variables were measured pre- and post-test.
  • Analysis used three-level random-effects multilevel regression with children nested in classes nested in schools, adjusting post-intervention physical activity for baseline activity, age, and sex. Complete-case intention-to-treat analyses were supplemented by baseline-imputed sensitivity analyses; mediation was explored using Baron and Kenny criteria.

Limitations

  • The paper states that sample size was determined by school availability rather than formal power analysis, making type II errors more likely; a full randomised controlled trial is needed for conclusive effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and process evaluation.
  • The paper notes that comparing matched control and intervention classes within the same schools could have introduced interaction/contamination bias, though any such bias would likely favour the null hypothesis.
  • The paper states that self-reported physical activity may be biased by recall limitations and recommends objective measures such as accelerometry in future research; it also notes that formal mediation analysis was beyond the scope due to sample size and power. Evident from the text: attrition was mostly sixth graders changing schools between the 3- and 9-month follow-ups, and missing data were assumed missing completely at random.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870440802040707

Cites

63 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 56 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given

    The intervention was found acceptable and feasible for delivery by a school psychologist and a physical education teacher.

    “The intervention was found to be acceptable and feasible for delivery by a school psychologist and a physical education teacher.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    In the intervention group of the second pilot, the proportion reporting at least 3 sessions of physical exercise per week increased from 27% at pre-test to 48% at post-test.

    “In the intervention group, the proportion of participants reporting at least 3 sessions of physical exercise a week increased from 27% at pre test to 48% at post-test in the intervention group (McIntyre & Araújo-Soares, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McIntyre & Araújo-Soares, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    Explorative analyses of time-lagged mediation of Time 4 behaviour effects through Time 2 cognition effects found no evidence for mediation.

    “Explorative analyses of a possible time-lagged mediation of Time 4 effects on behaviour through more immediate Time 2 effects of cognitions found no evidence for mediation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    At 3-month follow-up, the difference was 33 minutes per week (95% CI -4 to 71; p=.082).

    “This difference increased to 33 minutes (95% CI -4 to 71; p = .082)at three months and to 57 minutes (95% CI 13 to 101, p= .008)at nine month follow-up.”
    • Also stated in: § Estimation of effects · plain
      “This difference increases to 33 minutes per week at 3-month follow-up and approaches significance (CL: -4-71; p=.08).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    This study found no evidence of mediation.

    “However, in this study, no evidence for mediation was found.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Multilevel analyses indicated that adolescents in intervention classes perceived more negative outcomes associated with current PA and reported higher coping planning.

    “Multilevel analyses indicated that adolescents in the intervention classes perceived more negative outcomes associated with their current levels of physical activity (situation-outcome expectancies) and reported higher levels of coping planning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Trends favouring intervention were not significant for self-efficacy and approached significance for action planning.

    “Trends favouring the intervention group were not significant for self-efficacy and approached significance for action planning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sensitivity analysis imputing baseline PA for missing values confirmed significant group differences at Time 4 and a trend approaching significance at Time 3.

    “While imputing pre-intervention baseline data for missing values naturally decreases the point estimates of effects, the sensitivity analysis confirms the significant group differences at Time 4 and the trend approaching significance at Time 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants in the intervention group showed significantly higher increases in situation outcome expectancies and coping planning than controls.

    “Participants in the intervention group showed significantly higher increases in situation outcome expectancies and coping planning than controls, i.e., they became more aware that their current levels of physical activity might not be sufficient to achieve positive outcomes and developed clearer plans about how to deal with barriers for regular PA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Baseline PA and sex accounted for significant variance in PA, while age did not.

    “The random effects regression analyses show that baseline PA (T2: B=.33; SE=.04; p<.001; T3: B=.41; SE=.06; p<.001; T4: B=.27; SE=.05; p<.001) and sex (T2: B=52.5;SE=14.6;p<.001) both account for significant amounts of variance in PA, while age does not contribute to the equation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Trends for self-efficacy and action planning favoured intervention but were not significant.

    “Trends for selfefficacy and action planning favour the intervention group but remain insignificant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The models accounted for 24.9% of variance at Time 2, 29.8% at Time 3, and 36.9% at Time 4.

    “These models account for 24.9% of the variance at Time 2; 29.8% at Time 3 and 36.9% at Time 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The intervention effect on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was not statistically significant at Time 2 or Time 3.

    “Time 2 | 119 | (134) | 100 | (143) | 18 | -10 | 46 | 0.202”
    • Also stated in: § Limitations and future research · plain
      “Time 3 | 141 | (171) | 104 | (170) | 33 | -4 | 71 | 0.082”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Action planning and coping planning both correlated significantly with physical activity.

    “Both measures show significant correlations with physical activity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Theory-based interventions allow testing whether the intervention modifies hypothesised determinants and whether those changes mediate behaviour change.

    “Moreover, applications of theory-based interventions present an opportunity to test if an intervention successfully modifies the hypothesised determinants and if these changes mediate behaviour change effects (Baranowski, et al., 1998;Michie & Abraham, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baranowski, et al., 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Michie & Abraham, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous physical activity interventions were weakly effective and maintenance of effects was poor.

    “Previous PA interventions were weakly effective (Dishman & Buckworth, 1996;Kahn et al., 2002;Stone, McKenzie, Welk, & Booth, 1998) and maintenance of effects has been poor (Biddle, Gorely & Stensel, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dishman & Buckworth, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kahn et al., 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Biddle, Gorely & Stensel, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The intervention programme is based on social cognitive theory, self-regulation theory, and planning, which are treated as evidence-based mediators of physical activity change.

    “The intervention is based on social cognitive theory (SCT), self-regulation theory (SRT) and planning as evidence-based mediators of physical activity changes.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “The intervention was based on social cognitive theory and self-regulation theory and incorporates action planning and coping planning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Social cognitive theory assumes behaviour is guided by beliefs acquired through interaction with the environment, especially beliefs about consequences and capabilities.

    “Social cognitive theory (SCT; Bandura, 1997) assumes that behaviour is guided by beliefs that people acquire in their ongoing interaction with the environment; in particular beliefs about the consequences of behaviour and individual capabilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bandura, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Portuguese adolescents have some of the lowest physical activity levels in Europe and a high prevalence of health risk behaviours.

    “Portuguese adolescents show some of the lowest levels of PA in Europe and an overall high prevalence of health risk behaviours (McIntyre et al., 1998;Riddoch, et al., 2004;WHO, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites McIntyre et al., 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Riddoch, et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites WHO, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most previous trials were based in the United States and little evidence about behaviour change in European adolescents is available.

    “The majority of previous trials have been based in the United States and little evidence about behaviour change in European adolescents is available (Marcus et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marcus et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The intervention is of minimal intensity and thus potentially a highly economic means of health promotion in schools.

    “The intervention studied is of minimal intensity (two 90 minute sessions on physical activity) and thus potentially a highly economic means of health promotion in schools.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study used a cluster-randomised design in which two classes per school similar in socio-demographic variables were randomly assigned to intervention or control after initial assessment.

    “The study used a cluster-randomised design.In each school two classes similar in socio-demographic variables were selected and randomly assigned to intervention or control condition after initial assessment.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “Two classes, paired on socialeconomic variables, were selected from each of eight Portuguese schools and randomly assigned to an intervention or control group (N=291).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An inexpensive classroom-based intervention can potentially reach a large number of adolescents and produce health promotion effects if a moderate increase in PA is delivered to many individuals.

    “An inexpensive classroom-based intervention can potentially reach a large number of adolescents and produce tremendous health promotion effects if a moderate increase in PA can be delivered to a large number of individuals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A formal mediation analysis was beyond the scope of this paper due to sample size and power considerations.

    “Although a formal mediation analysis was beyond the scope of this paper due to sample size and power considerations, pre-post changes in theoretical target variables were analysed to test if the intervention reached its immediate targets (Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Random effects were included for school and class to account for potential intra-cluster correlation.

    “Random effects were included for school and class to account for potential intra-cluster correlation (Rabe-Hesketh & Skrondal, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rabe-Hesketh & Skrondal, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Attrition was unrelated to intervention and not biased with regard to social-cognitive or behavioural baseline measures.

    “Attrition was unrelated to the intervention and not biased with regard to social-cognitive or behavioural baseline measures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The findings suggest that the intervention successfully changed the theory-based targets, but a non-significant trend for goal intentions in favour of controls needs further investigation.

    “While these findings suggest that the interventions successfully changed the theory-based targets, a non-significant trend for goal intentions in favour of the controls needs further investigation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In a recent study by Dishman et al. (2004), self-efficacy partly mediated the effects of a comprehensive school-based physical-activity programme in girls of similar age.

    “In a recent study by Dishman et al. (2004) self-efficacy partly Theory-based Intervention to enhance Physical Activity Among Adolescents -15mediated the effects of a comprehensive school-based physical-activity programme in girls with a similar age to the students in this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dishman et al. (2004)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    SCT and planning measures were developed based on a belief elicitation study and pilot studies following guidelines of leading theorists.

    “SCT measures were developed based on a belief elicitation study and pilot studies (Araújo-Soares, et al., in press;Araújo-Soares, 2006) following the guidelines of leading theorists (Ajzen, 2006;Bandura, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Araújo-Soares, et al., in press

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Araújo-Soares, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ajzen, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This could have resulted in a social environment reinforcing physical activity.

    “This could have resulted in a social environment reinforcing of physical activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is a growing body of evidence showing linear relationships between physical activity and health.

    “However, there is a growing body of evidence showing linear relationships between physical activity and health (Hallal et al, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hallal et al, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intervention participants became more aware that their current PA might be insufficient for positive outcomes and developed clearer plans for dealing with barriers to regular PA.

    “i.e., they became more aware that their current levels of physical activity might not be sufficient to achieve positive outcomes and developed clearer plans about how to deal with barriers for regular PA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The intervention seems to facilitate PA with a cumulative effect over nine months, resulting in a difference of nearly one hour per week at trial end.

    “The intervention seems to facilitate PA with a cumulative effect over nine months following the intervention resulting in a difference of nearly one hour a week at the end of the trial.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Data were analysed using three-level random effects ANCOVA linear regression, adjusting post-intervention PA at each time point for pre-intervention PA, age and sex.

    “Data were analysed using multilevel modelling techniques; a three level random effects analyses of covariance linear regression, adjusting post-intervention PA at each time point for pre-intervention PA, age and sex.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The underlying rationale of a theory-based intervention is that behaviour change is achieved by modifying theory-based determinants of behaviour.

    “The underlying rational of a theory-based intervention is that behaviour change is achieved by modifying theory-based determinants of behaviour (Michie & Abraham, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michie & Abraham, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The increasing effects may be due to group effects, as the intervention might have changed group norms, creating a culture of mastery and collective self-efficacy.

    “This may be due to group effects, as the intervention might have changed group norms, creating a culture of mastery and collective self-efficacy (Bandura, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bandura, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All analyses were conducted as complete cases intention-to-treat.

    “All analyses were therefore conducted as complete cases intention-to-treat analyses (Wood, White & Thompson, 2004;Wood, White, Hillsdon & Carpenter, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wood, White & Thompson, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wood, White, Hillsdon & Carpenter, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • The authors state this as an assumption: Missing data were missing completely at random.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous research has shown that adolescents often lead sedentary lifestyles despite good intentions to be active.

    “Previous research had shown that adolescents often lead sedentary lifestyles despite good intentions to be active (Araújo-Soares, McIntyre & Sniehotta, in press;McIntyre et al., 1998;Riddoch et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Araújo-Soares, McIntyre & Sniehotta, in press

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McIntyre et al., 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Riddoch et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A conservative sensitivity analysis imputing baseline PA for missing data was carried out to test robustness.

    “To test the robustness of the results to this assumption we also carried out a conservative sensitivity analysis imputing the baseline levels of PA for any missing data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Most behavioural interventions show immediate effects that over time lack sustainability.

    “Most behavioural interventions show immediate effects that over time lack sustainability (Marcus et al., 2006;Biddle et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Marcus et al., 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Biddle et al., 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and training procedures were established in a one-group design with pre, post and 9-month follow-up in 107 students from four schools.

    “Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and the training procedures were established in a one-group design with pre, post and 9 months follow up, with 107 students from four different schools in Northern Portugal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    These findings are in line with recent evidence that theory-based measures of cognitions mediate the effects of theory-based interventions.

    “These findings are also in line with recent evidence that theory-based measures of cognitions mediate the effects of theory-based interventions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    Seasonal effects might have contributed to the observed differences.

    “Moreover, seasonal effects might have contributed.Baseline measures were taken in October/November (autumn), post-tests in November/December (winter), 3-months follow-up in March (spring and period for school exams) and the 9-months follow-up took place in September (end of summer vacations).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SCT is an evidence-based theory of individual-environment interaction, holding that the environment influences behaviour by shaping and constraining beliefs.

    “SCT is an evidence-based theory about the interaction of individual and environmental factors and argues that the environment affects behaviour by constraining and changing beliefs (Bandura, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bandura, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    That smoking cessation study found no benefit of planning because few participants were smokers.

    “This study failed to find beneficial effects of planning because few subjects turned out to be smokers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Higgins & Conner, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The IPAQ is one of the most studied self-report measures, and validation studies show good reliability and acceptable validity against accelerometer measures.

    “The IPAQ is amongst the best-studied self-report measures and validation studies indicate good reliability and acceptable validity with regard to accelerometer measures (Craig et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Craig et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Using matched control and intervention classes within the same schools could have biased the findings through interaction between adolescents in both classes.

    “Comparing matched control classes with intervention classes in the same schools might have biased the findings due to interaction between adolescents for both classes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
42 of 42
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Missing data were missing completely at random.

    “Missing data were assumed to be missing completely at random because the students discontinuing the study moved to other schools.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Observational measures and monitoring devices can have strong demand characteristics that may affect self-monitoring.

    “Observational measures and the use of monitoring devices can have strong demand characteristics which might affect self-monitoring.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Higgins and Conner citation year does not match the reference

    Minor

    The discussion cites Higgins and Conner as 2004, but the listed reference is dated 2003.

  • Post-test p-value differs between the abstract and Table 3

    Minor

    The abstract reports p = .249 for the post-test physical-activity difference, while Table 3 reports 0.202 for the same 18-minute effect and confidence interval.

  • Tell and Vellar citation year does not match the reference

    Minor

    The text cites Tell and Vellar as 1987, while their listed reference is dated 1988.

  • Ajzen citation year does not match the reference

    Minor

    The methods cite Ajzen as 2006, but the listed Ajzen reference is dated 2004.

  • Nine-month p-value differs between the abstract and Table 3

    Minor

    For the same 57-minute difference and 13-to-101 confidence interval, the abstract gives p = .008 and Table 3 gives 0.011.

  • Simkin and Gross citation year does not match the reference

    Minor

    The text cites Simkin and Gross as 1996, whereas their listed reference is dated 1994.

6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Abraham C, Health Psychology
  2. Ajzen I, 2006, Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations.
  3. Araújo-Soares V, 2006, Development and evaluation of a theory-based health promotion programme on physical activity and healthy diet in adolescents
  4. Bandura A, 2005, Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 312
  5. 1998, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 47, 1
  6. Fishbein M, 1991, Factors influencing behavior and behavior change: Final report of the theorists’ workshop
  7. McIntyre T, 1998, Advances in health psychology research
  8. McIntyre T, 2002, Programa integrado de promoção da saúde para ddolescentes “É o teu corpo: Usa-o bem!!!”- PIPSA
  9. Mischel W, 1978, Minnesota symposium on child psychology, 11, 199
  10. Rabe-Hesketh S, 2005, Multilevel and longitudinal modelling using stata

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Araújo-Soares, V., McIntyre, T., MacLennan, G., & Sniehotta, F. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2009-09
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
805-822
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W1985040357
Cited by
71
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Scottish Government
  • Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
physical activity, adolescents, school-based intervention, social cognitive theory, self-regulation theory, planning, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, outcome expectations, coping planning, intervention development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Portugal, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review