Neurocognitive subgroups in major depressive disorder
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is commonly associated with neurocognitive dysfunction. However, there remains substantial heterogeneity between patients and inconsistent findings regarding the magnitude and prevalence of specific neurocognitive deficits. This study aimed to investigate the potential for different neurocognitive subgroups in patients diagnosed with MDD. METHOD: Data were pooled from 4 different clinical trials that involved adults diagnosed with MDD. Neurocognitive outcomes included measures of verbal learning and memory, executive function, attention, and processing speed. Latent class analysis was conducted to examine for different subgroups based on neurocognitive profiles of performance across outcome measures. Subgroups were compared to a separate sample of age-matched adult healthy controls, across illness factors, and individual mood items on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: Within the MDD cohort (N = 149), 45% of participants were considered relatively "cognitively preserved," with the remainder "cognitively reduced" (39%) or "cognitively impaired" (16%). Verbal memory performance was significantly poorer compared to attention and processing speed only in the "cognitively impaired" subgroup. There was no association between subgroup membership and relevant illness factors, including ratings on individual MADRS items. LIMITATIONS: Data were pooled from several studies that included different neurocognitive measures and cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of MDD participants had no or minimal objective cognitive difficulties, and neurocognitive functioning was found generally unrelated to illness factors. Future longitudinal research is warranted to determine whether the people who are relatively cognitively impaired are at increased risk for further cognitive decline. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some evidence suggests heterogenous profiles of neurocognitive dysfunction among individuals experiencing depression and that treatment resistance may drive the existence of subgroups with particularly high levels of dysfunction.
“Some evidence suggests that there are heterogenous profiles of neurocognitive dysfunction among individuals experiencing depression (Martin et al., 2020) and that treatment resistance may drive the existence of subgroups with particularly high levels of dysfunction (Vicent-Gil et al., 2021).”
From Neurocognitive effects of theta burst stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adults: A systematic review and recommendations for future research (2025) · cites this paper as Martin et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression
Drysdale, A. T., Grosenick, L., Downar, J., Dunlop, K., Mansouri, F., Meng, Y., Fetcho, R. N., Zebley, B., Oathes, D. J., Etkin, A., et al. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4246 · Cited by 2,170 · see citing works
for the ENIGMA-Major Depressive Disorder Working Group, Schmaal, L., Veltman, D. J., van Erp, T. G. M., Sämann, P. G., Frodl, T., Jahanshad, N., Loehrer, E., Tiemeier, H., Hofman, A., et al. (2016) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2015.69 · Cited by 1,172 · see citing works
Ahern, E., & Semkovska, M. (2017) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000319 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
BELZER, K., & SCHNEIER, F. R. (2004) · Journal of Psychiatric Practice · doi:10.1097/00131746-200409000-00003 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Depression as a modifiable factor to decrease the risk of dementia
Almeida, O. P., Hankey, G. J., Yeap, B. B., Golledge, J., & Flicker, L. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.90 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
van Hulst, B. M., de Zeeuw, P., & Durston, S. (2015) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714001792 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Christensen, H., Griffiths, K., Mackinnon, A., Jacomb, P. 1997. A quantitative review of cognitive deficits in depression and Alzheimer-type dementia. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 3, 631-651.
- Diniz, B.S., Butters, M.A., Albert, S.M., Dew, M.A., Reynolds, C.F. 2013. Late-life depression and risk of vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of community based cohort studies. Br. J. Psychiatry 202, 329-35.
- First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J.B.W. 2002. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition. (SCID- I/P). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
- Hasselbalch, B.J., Knorr, U., Kessing, L.V. 2011. Cognitive impairment in the remitted state of unipolar depressive disorder: a systematic review. J Affect. Disord. 134, 20-31.
- Henry, J., Crawford, J.R. 2005. A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency deficits in depression. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 27, 78-101.
- Jaeger, J., Berns, S., Uzelac, S., Davis-Conway, S. 2006. Neurocognitive deficits and disability in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 145(1), 39-48.
- Loo, C.K., Katalinic, N., Smith, D.J., Ingram, A., Dowling, N., Martin, D., Addison, K., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Simpson, B., Schweitzer, I. 2015. A randomized controlled trial of brief and ultrabrief pulse right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 18(1).
- Loo, C.K., Husain, M.M., McDonald, W.M., Aaronson, S., O'Reardon, J.P., Alonzo, A., Weickert, C.S., Martin, D.M., McClintock, S.M., Mohan, A., Lisanby, S.H. 2018.International randomized-controlled trial of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul. 11(1), 125-133.
- Magidson, J., Vermunt, J.K. 2002. Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K- means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research 20, 37-44.
- Magidson, J., Vermunt, J.K. 2004. Latent class models. In The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences (ed. D. Kaplan), pp. 1-24. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.
- McClintock, S.M., Husain, M.M., Greer, T.L., Cullum, C.M. 2010. Association between depression severity and neurocognitive function in major depressive disorder: a review and synthesis. Neuropsychology 24, 9-34.
- Morin, R.T., Insel, P., Nelson, C., Butters, M., Bickford, D., Landau, S., Saykin, A., Weiner, M., Mackin, R.S and ADNI Depression Project. 2019. Latent classes of cognitive functioning among depressed older adults without dementia. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 25(8), 811-820.
- Rock, P.L., Roiser, J.P., Riedel, W.J., Blackwell, A.D. 2014. Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 44, 2029-2040.
- Slick, D.J. 2006. Psychometrics in neuropsychological assessment. In Strauss E. Sherman E. M. S. Spreen O. (Eds.), A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary, third edition (pp. 343). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Snyder, H.R. 2013. Major Depressive Disorder is Associated with Broad Impairments on Neuropsyschological Measures of Executive Function: A Meta-Analysis and Review. Psychol. Bull. 139, 81-132.
- Wechsler, D. 2008. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV), 4 th edn.
- Pearson, San Antonio, TX.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nikolin, S., Tan, Y. Y., Schwaab, A., Moffa, A., Loo, C. K., & Martin, D. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.084 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationHutnyan, M., & McClintock, S. M. (2025) · Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.transm.2025.100088 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Martin, D. M., Wollny-Huttarsch, D., Nikolin, S., McClintock, S. M., Alonzo, A., Lisanby, S. H., & Loo, C. K.
- Affiliations
- Black Dog Institute (AU)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Martin, Donel M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuropsychology
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 726-734
- ISSN
- 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1559
- OpenAlex
- W3019097386
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (568678; 1051423)
- Stanley Medical Research Foundation (11T-005)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, neurocognitive impairment, cognitive subgroups, verbal memory, executive function, attention, processing speed, latent class analysis, cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reaction Time, Verbal Learning, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review