Cited by 29Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neurocognitive subgroups in major depressive disorder

Open access
Martin, Donel M., Wollny-Huttarsch, David, Nikolin, Stevan, McClintock, Shawn M., Alonzo, Angelo, Lisanby, Sarah H., Loo, Colleen K.·2020·Neuropsychology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is commonly associated with neurocognitive dysfunction. However, there remains substantial heterogeneity between patients and inconsistent findings regarding the magnitude and prevalence of specific neurocognitive deficits. This study aimed to investigate the potential for different neurocognitive subgroups in patients diagnosed with MDD. METHOD: Data were pooled from 4 different clinical trials that involved adults diagnosed with MDD. Neurocognitive outcomes included measures of verbal learning and memory, executive function, attention, and processing speed. Latent class analysis was conducted to examine for different subgroups based on neurocognitive profiles of performance across outcome measures. Subgroups were compared to a separate sample of age-matched adult healthy controls, across illness factors, and individual mood items on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: Within the MDD cohort (N = 149), 45% of participants were considered relatively "cognitively preserved," with the remainder "cognitively reduced" (39%) or "cognitively impaired" (16%). Verbal memory performance was significantly poorer compared to attention and processing speed only in the "cognitively impaired" subgroup. There was no association between subgroup membership and relevant illness factors, including ratings on individual MADRS items. LIMITATIONS: Data were pooled from several studies that included different neurocognitive measures and cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of MDD participants had no or minimal objective cognitive difficulties, and neurocognitive functioning was found generally unrelated to illness factors. Future longitudinal research is warranted to determine whether the people who are relatively cognitively impaired are at increased risk for further cognitive decline. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/neu0000626

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Christensen, H., Griffiths, K., Mackinnon, A., Jacomb, P. 1997. A quantitative review of cognitive deficits in depression and Alzheimer-type dementia. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 3, 631-651.
  2. Diniz, B.S., Butters, M.A., Albert, S.M., Dew, M.A., Reynolds, C.F. 2013. Late-life depression and risk of vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of community based cohort studies. Br. J. Psychiatry 202, 329-35.
  3. First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J.B.W. 2002. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition. (SCID- I/P). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
  4. Hasselbalch, B.J., Knorr, U., Kessing, L.V. 2011. Cognitive impairment in the remitted state of unipolar depressive disorder: a systematic review. J Affect. Disord. 134, 20-31.
  5. Henry, J., Crawford, J.R. 2005. A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency deficits in depression. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 27, 78-101.
  6. Jaeger, J., Berns, S., Uzelac, S., Davis-Conway, S. 2006. Neurocognitive deficits and disability in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 145(1), 39-48.
  7. Loo, C.K., Katalinic, N., Smith, D.J., Ingram, A., Dowling, N., Martin, D., Addison, K., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Simpson, B., Schweitzer, I. 2015. A randomized controlled trial of brief and ultrabrief pulse right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 18(1).
  8. Loo, C.K., Husain, M.M., McDonald, W.M., Aaronson, S., O'Reardon, J.P., Alonzo, A., Weickert, C.S., Martin, D.M., McClintock, S.M., Mohan, A., Lisanby, S.H. 2018.International randomized-controlled trial of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul. 11(1), 125-133.
  9. Magidson, J., Vermunt, J.K. 2002. Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K- means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research 20, 37-44.
  10. Magidson, J., Vermunt, J.K. 2004. Latent class models. In The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences (ed. D. Kaplan), pp. 1-24. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.
  11. McClintock, S.M., Husain, M.M., Greer, T.L., Cullum, C.M. 2010. Association between depression severity and neurocognitive function in major depressive disorder: a review and synthesis. Neuropsychology 24, 9-34.
  12. Morin, R.T., Insel, P., Nelson, C., Butters, M., Bickford, D., Landau, S., Saykin, A., Weiner, M., Mackin, R.S and ADNI Depression Project. 2019. Latent classes of cognitive functioning among depressed older adults without dementia. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 25(8), 811-820.
  13. Rock, P.L., Roiser, J.P., Riedel, W.J., Blackwell, A.D. 2014. Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 44, 2029-2040.
  14. Slick, D.J. 2006. Psychometrics in neuropsychological assessment. In Strauss E. Sherman E. M. S. Spreen O. (Eds.), A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary, third edition (pp. 343). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Snyder, H.R. 2013. Major Depressive Disorder is Associated with Broad Impairments on Neuropsyschological Measures of Executive Function: A Meta-Analysis and Review. Psychol. Bull. 139, 81-132.
  16. Wechsler, D. 2008. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV), 4 th edn.
  17. Pearson, San Antonio, TX.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, D. M., Wollny-Huttarsch, D., Nikolin, S., McClintock, S. M., Alonzo, A., Lisanby, S. H., & Loo, C. K.
Affiliations
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Martin, Donel M.
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2020-09
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
726-734
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W3019097386
Cited by
29
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (568678; 1051423)
  • Stanley Medical Research Foundation (11T-005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, neurocognitive impairment, cognitive subgroups, verbal memory, executive function, attention, processing speed, latent class analysis, cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reaction Time, Verbal Learning, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review