CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 593Stress and Burnout ResearchWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingWorkplace Health and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next?

Sonnentag, Sabine, Venz, Laura, Casper, Anne·2017·Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
DOI 10.1037/ocp0000079
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

that differentiates between recovery as a process and recovery as an outcome. Empirical studies have shown that recovery activities (e.g., physical exercise) and recovery experiences (e.g., psychological detachment from work) are negatively associated with strain symptoms (e.g., exhaustion) and positively associated with positive well-being indicators (e.g., vigor). Recovery activities and recovery experiences suffer when employees face a high level of job stressors. Psychological mechanisms underlying recovery seem to be similar across different temporal recovery settings (e.g., work breaks, free evenings, vacations) and seem to be enhanced in natural environments. Intervention studies have pointed to a diverse set of strategies for how everyday job-stress recovery can be supported. This article discusses 5 avenues for future research, with a particular focus on individual and contextual factors that may influence recovery as well as highlighting more complex temporal patterns than those uncovered in previous research. (PsycINFO Database Record

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ocp0000079

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 148 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 593

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sonnentag, S., Venz, L., & Casper, A.
Affiliations
University of Mannheim (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2017-07
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
365-380
ISSN
  • 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1307
DOI
10.1037/ocp0000079
OpenAlex
W2599271079
Cited by
587
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 5
FWCI
55.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
recovery, occupational stress, recovery activities, recovery experiences, psychological detachment, rest breaks, holidays, natural environment, occupational stressors, exhaustion, vigor, well-being, recovery interventions
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Leisure Activities, Surveys and Questionnaires, Relaxation, Work, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review